[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Proposal on how to handle xorg include patches (WAS: Re: X Strike Force XOrg SVN commit: r28 - /)



On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 09:20:21AM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin wrote:
> 
> | +|
> | +|-->  xorg-source-include                       -->  xorg-include
> 
> Hi XSF,
> ~      as you might have noticed, we started (at low priority) working on
> X.org packages.
> 
> The commits you are seeing now are only the proof of concept that we
> will use to split the tree in a "sort of" modularized way, using an
> approach close to the way in which our Debian kernel is packaged.
> There are some differences, but at this point in time, until the concept
> is not proved to be working, are somehow irrelevant.

Note that the -source vs -image package in the kernel are an sbolute
maintaine horror, I would strongly advice against repeating that
mistake.



Reply to: