On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 06:27:49PM +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 07:31:56AM -0700, Daniel Stone wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 01:38:41PM +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > > > pleeease? > > > > > > it'd be a lot cleaner. > > > > > > and probably FHS compliant. > > > > > > and cause a lot less hassle for selinux. > > > > Yes, and /tmp/.ICE-unix and /tmp/.X11-unix can do this too; the problem > > is older apps which have static libX11 or their own transport > > implementations, which won't see the changed directories, and things > > will then go awry. That said, it needs to be done -- probably > > post-sarge, I'd imagine, and maybe with the move to the modular tree > > when we start re-evaluating many things which we've long taken for > > granted. > > fantastic. I don't think anyone really objects to this -- it's just a matter of making the change at the right time. (cd /usr; ln -s . X11R6) on the other hand... ;-) -- G. Branden Robinson | Kissing girls is a goodness. It is Debian GNU/Linux | a growing closer. It beats the branden@debian.org | hell out of card games. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Robert Heinlein
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature