On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 01:48:53PM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: > * Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>: > > > > The EIP was generated by a binary that belonged into the > > > xserver-common package, so Ithought it would be reasonable. > > > > Which binary was that? > > According to the EIP I had attached: > > ... > May 15 10:38:23 shawarma kernel: ds: 007b es: 007b ss: 0068 > May 15 10:38:23 shawarma kernel: Process XFree86 (pid: 3067, threadinfo=d509c000 task=d686c0b0) > ... ^^^^^^^ > > What is XFree86? > > $ locate XFree86 > ... snip ... > /usr/X11R6/bin/XFree86 > ... snip ... > > $ dpkg -S /usr/X11R6/bin/XFree86 > xserver-xfree86: /usr/X11R6/bin/XFree86 I apologize; I confused this bug with one you filed against xserver-common. You did the right thing. -- G. Branden Robinson | Do not attempt to disprove the Debian GNU/Linux | four-colour theorem on your flag! branden@debian.org | -- Josh Parsons http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature