X Strike Force XFree86 SVN commit: r1417 - trunk/debian
Author: branden
Date: 2004-05-18 03:01:52 -0500 (Tue, 18 May 2004)
New Revision: 1417
Modified:
trunk/debian/TODO
Log:
Defer some items per Fabio.
Remove duplicate item.
Modified: trunk/debian/TODO
===================================================================
--- trunk/debian/TODO 2004-05-18 07:57:45 UTC (rev 1416)
+++ trunk/debian/TODO 2004-05-18 08:01:52 UTC (rev 1417)
@@ -13,14 +13,6 @@
important items come first.
* #248144: xfree86: please add Turkish po-debconf translation [INTL:tr]
-* Fix upstream install rule that prevents Xcursor themes from being
- installed on s390. As I understand it, this is client-side stuff and
- there's not really any reason it shouldn't be made available on the s390
- architecture.
-* Fix other gratuitous differences between s390 debehlper files and the
- generic ones by fixing upstream Imakeage to not turn extra stuff off when
- the XFree86 X server is not being built (like xmodmap.std). It ships
- libXxf86vm.a but not the corresponding manpages.
Post 4.3.0-1
------------
@@ -93,10 +85,17 @@
has to do with 64-bit machines, not ATI Mach64 video chipsets. Also the
corresponding kludge to "if defined(_LP64) && defined(__sparcv9)", as
suggested by Christoph Hellwig.
-* #248144: add Turkish template translations
* Grab patch from upstream:
+ C-style comments were being stripped by preprocessing.
Message-Id: <200311230540.hAN5ebYR013773@public.xfree86.org>
+* Fix upstream install rule that prevents Xcursor themes from being
+ installed on s390. As I understand it, this is client-side stuff and
+ there's not really any reason it shouldn't be made available on the s390
+ architecture.
+* Fix other gratuitous differences between s390 debehlper files and the
+ generic ones by fixing upstream Imakeage to not turn extra stuff off when
+ the XFree86 X server is not being built (like xmodmap.std). It ships
+ libXxf86vm.a but not the corresponding manpages.
Do opportunistically, only in conjuction with other fixes
---------------------------------------------------------
Reply to: