X Strike Force XFree86 SVN commit: rev 1011 - branches/4.3.0/sid/debian
Author: branden
Date: 2004-02-09 00:54:15 -0500 (Mon, 09 Feb 2004)
New Revision: 1011
Modified:
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/TODO
Log:
Update patch status.
Modified: branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/TODO
===================================================================
--- branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/TODO 2004-02-09 05:52:13 UTC (rev 1010)
+++ branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/TODO 2004-02-09 05:54:15 UTC (rev 1011)
@@ -147,7 +147,7 @@
046_piclib_support.diff merged 909__debian_piclib_support
047_fix_xfree86_man_version_string.diff merged 007__fix_xfree86_man_version_string
048_get_rid_of_xroot_in_manpages.diff upstream
-049_remove_duplicate_XShm_prototype.diff NOT MERGED subsequently on CVS HEAD; needs to be dragged over to 000_stolen_from_HEAD
+049_remove_duplicate_XShm_prototype.diff merged 064_remove_duplicate_XShm_prototype
050_XF86Config_manpage_fixes.diff upstream
051_symbols_macintosh_us.diff upstream
052_Xinerama_headers_include_Xlib_headers.diff unchanged 029_xinerama_needs_xlib.h
@@ -164,10 +164,10 @@
063_mga_texmode_restore_fix.diff upstream
065_sis_drm_ioctl_kludge.diff irrelevant upstream stopped (directly) referencing the kernel symbols in question
066_more_sis_drm_ioctl_kludge.diff irrelevant upstream stopped (directly) referencing the kernel symbols in question
-067_nonexecutable_malloced_mem.diff INCOMPLETE mostly upstream, but restricted to OpenBSD and Linux/IA-64
+067_nonexecutable_malloced_mem.diff merged 071_nonexecutable_malloced_mem
068_riscpc_ioport_fix.diff merged 021_riscpc_ioport_fix
069_r128_driver_pitch_tweak.diff merged 022_r128_driver_pitch_tweak
-070_fbdevhw_device_node_warnings.diff INCOMPLETE only first hunk needs to be forward-parted, the rest is upstream
+070_fbdevhw_device_node_warnings.diff merged
072_r128_dma_for_xv_option.diff upstream
075_conditionalize_xie_headers.diff unchanged 020_conditionalize_xie_headers; WILL BE IRRELEVANT IN 4.4.0 (xc/include/extensions/Imakefile 3.54)
076_xterm_workaround_getpt_lie.diff upstream
Reply to: