[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#230243: marked as done (xbase-clients: startx -- :0 uses too large UI fonts)



Your message dated Tue, 3 Feb 2004 17:10:50 -0500
with message-id <20040203221050.GO22115@deadbeast.net>
and subject line Bug#230243: xbase-clients: startx -- :0 uses too large UI fonts
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Jan 2004 12:52:31 +0000
>From liontooth@cogweb.net Thu Jan 29 04:52:31 2004
Return-path: <liontooth@cogweb.net>
Received: from steen6.sscnet.ucla.edu (gubbio) [128.97.184.93] (mail)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1AmBep-0006MR-00; Thu, 29 Jan 2004 04:52:31 -0800
Received: from root by gubbio with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 1AmBeo-0003Ui-00; Thu, 29 Jan 2004 04:52:30 -0800
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: David Liontooth <liontooth@cogweb.net>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: xbase-clients: startx -- :0 uses too large UI fonts
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.37
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 04:52:29 -0800
Message-Id: <E1AmBeo-0003Ui-00@gubbio>
X-BadReturnPath: root@gubbio rewritten as liontooth@cogweb.net
  using "From" header
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_27 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_27
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: xbase-clients
Version: 4.3.0-0pre1v5
Severity: normal


When I start X11 using a simple startx, I get the right size fonts, corresponding to 
what is defined in Fonts in the KDE control center, or in Mozilla's defaults. 

When I start X11 using startx -- :0, I get fonts that are about 6 steps too large. So
to get the fonts to look right, I have to decrease the font size in the KDE Control
Center from, say, 12 to 6.

GUI fonts in all applications are too large -- the splash screen, mozilla, KDE. 

It doesn't matter which x-server number you tell startx to start. For instance, 
startx -- :3 does the same. User also doesn't matter.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Linux sigillo 2.6.0-test11 #1 Mon Dec 29 19:27:55 PST 2003 i686 GNU/Linux
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages xbase-clients depends on:
ii  cpp-3.2                   1:3.2.3-9      The GNU C preprocessor
ii  libc6                     2.3.2.ds1-10   GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libdps1                   4.3.0-0pre1v5  Display PostScript (DPS) client li
ii  libexpat1                 1.95.6-6       XML parsing C library - runtime li
ii  libfontconfig1            2.2.1-13       generic font configuration library
ii  libfreetype6              2.1.7-1        FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
ii  libice6                   4.3.0-0pre1v5  Inter-Client Exchange library
ii  libncurses5               5.3.20030719-4 Shared libraries for terminal hand
ii  libpng12-0                1.2.5.0-4      PNG library - runtime
ii  libsm6                    4.3.0-0pre1v5  X Window System Session Management
ii  libstdc++5                1:3.3.3-0pre1  The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libxaw7                   4.3.0-0pre1v5  X Athena widget set library
ii  libxcursor1               1.0.2-4        X Cursor management library
ii  libxext6                  4.3.0-0pre1v5  X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii  libxft2                   2.1.2-5        FreeType-based font drawing librar
ii  libxi6                    4.3.0-0pre1v5  X Window System Input extension li
ii  libxmu6                   4.3.0-0pre1v5  X Window System miscellaneous util
ii  libxmuu1                  4.3.0-0pre1v5  lightweight X Window System miscel
ii  libxpm4                   4.3.0-0pre1v5  X pixmap library
ii  libxrandr2                4.3.0-0pre1v5  X Window System Resize, Rotate and
ii  libxrender1               0.8.3-5        X Rendering Extension client libra
ii  libxt6                    4.3.0-0pre1v5  X Toolkit Intrinsics
ii  libxtrap6                 4.3.0-0pre1v5  X Window System protocol-trapping 
ii  libxtst6                  4.3.0-0pre1v5  X Window System event recording an
ii  libxv1                    4.3.0-0pre1v5  X Window System video extension li
ii  xlibmesa-gl [libgl1]      4.3.0-0pre1v5  Mesa 3D graphics library [XFree86]
ii  xlibmesa-glu [libglu1]    4.3.0-0pre1v5  Mesa OpenGL utility library [XFree
ii  xlibs                     4.3.0-0pre1v5  X Window System client libraries m
ii  xlibs-data                4.3.0-0pre1v5  X Window System client data
ii  zlib1g                    1:1.2.1-3      compression library - runtime

-- no debconf information


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 230243-done) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Feb 2004 22:10:52 +0000
>From branden@deadbeast.net Tue Feb 03 14:10:52 2004
Return-path: <branden@deadbeast.net>
Received: from dhcp065-026-182-085.indy.rr.com (redwald.deadbeast.net) [65.26.182.85] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1Ao8kt-0003Fx-00; Tue, 03 Feb 2004 14:10:52 -0800
Received: by redwald.deadbeast.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 0FE5E6445C; Tue,  3 Feb 2004 17:10:51 -0500 (EST)
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 17:10:50 -0500
From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>
To: 230243-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#230243: xbase-clients: startx -- :0 uses too large UI fonts
Message-ID: <20040203221050.GO22115@deadbeast.net>
References: <E1AmBeo-0003Ui-00@gubbio> <20040129153332.GE4825@deadbeast.net> <401AC0C2.5030101@cogweb.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="gh4H09KImyIEQ1se"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <401AC0C2.5030101@cogweb.net>
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
X-No-CC: I subscribe to this list; do not CC me on replies.
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Delivered-To: 230243-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01
X-Spam-Level: 


--gh4H09KImyIEQ1se
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 12:38:26PM -0800, David Liontooth wrote:
> Branden Robinson wrote:
> >When you pass arguments to the X server via startx, you are overriding
> >the default arguments sent to the X server by xinitrc.
> >
> >The startx(1x) and xinit(1x) manpages have more on this.
> >
> >Try these two command lines:
> >
> >startx -- :0 -dpi 75
> >
> >startx -- :0 -dpi 100
> >
> >Which looks more correct?
> >
> Great! This fully resolves my problem and I suggest the bug report be=20
> closed as incorrect.

Okay.  Closing this report with this message.

> I understand from man startx that the content of .xinitrc could be=20
> placed in .xsession -- is this relevant to passing arguments to the X=20
> server via startx?

Not really.  Note that that bit about putting .xintirc stuff in
=2Exsession instead applies only (as far as I know) to Debian systems,
where I have set things up such that the user's environment strives to
be identical whether xdm or startx/xinit is used.

> Or put differently, is there a way to pass argument to the X server
> via startx that retains the default arguments sent to the X server by
> xinitrc, with the exception of the argument you pass via startx?

No.  This wouldn't be impossible, but it is a feature that would have to
be implemented.  It would also need some consideration, as in general
people are pretty used to the semantics of xinit and startx that are
described in their manpages.

> That is to say, it would be useful if default values remain in force=20
> unless they are explicitly overridden.

I agree, and it would have been nice if xinit had been written that way
=66rom the beginning.  Unfortunately, it has 15 years of inertia or so.

> The process of starting the X server is byzantine and may need to be,

It probably needs to be somewhat Byzantine, but I won't attempt to
defend the proposition that it is no *more* Byzantine than it needs to
be.  :)

> but if anything can be done to provide a better user interface that
> would be a big win. The power of the X server is one of the triumphs
> of free software, and it's surely underused.

That's one reason this package is fun to work on.  Sometimes, anyway.

If you continue to feel that xinit should be rewritten, please file a
wishlist-severity bug with the Debian BTS.

Thank you for your report.

--=20
G. Branden Robinson                |      "To be is to do"   -- Plato
Debian GNU/Linux                   |      "To do is to be"   -- Aristotle
branden@debian.org                 |      "Do be do be do"   -- Sinatra
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |

--gh4H09KImyIEQ1se
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkAgHGoACgkQ6kxmHytGonwCkQCdGS0uxrMr+3kWHF8Z71VHqL1p
3GwAnjfUyNdzPb9mvE/veOEY8xDR5d4Y
=97nI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--gh4H09KImyIEQ1se--



Reply to: