On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 07:51:00PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > 070_fbdevhw_device_node_warnings > -------------------------------- > Mostly upstream in 4.3.0 The following chunk isn't: > @@ -296,34 +296,45 @@ > } > if (namep) > *namep = NULL; > + xf86DrvMsg(-1, X_ERROR, > + "Unable to find a valid framebuffer device\n"); > return -1; > } > > >From the comments in the patch, it's not clear to me whether that chunk > is worth keeping or not. But you (Branden) wrote it, so you should know. > ;-) Yes, in my opinion, it is. I added this because I was get mysterious bug reports from fbdev users; they were experiencing failures with no visible cause. Turns out they didn't have a /dev/fb (or /dev/fb0) node in their filesystem. > 072_r128_dma_for_xv_option > -------------------------- > Upstream in 4.3.0. > > 075_conditionalize_xie_headers > ------------------------------ > Unchanged, renamed to 020_conditionalize_xie_headers.diff > > However, it was dealt with in a more drastic way in upstream HEAD > (in revision 3.54 of xc/include/extensions/Imakefile) > by removing the XIE and PEX code entirely and unconditionally. > So this patch can be noted as being irrelevant for 4.4.0 and subsequent > releases of XFree86. Thanks as always for your efforts! -- G. Branden Robinson | The basic test of freedom is Debian GNU/Linux | perhaps less in what we are free to branden@debian.org | do than in what we are free not to http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | do. -- Eric Hoffer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature