On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 09:30:19PM +0100, Petr Sebor wrote: > I have got the orig source, patched with the r951 and the files touched > by the patch I sent compiled ok > (no warnings, no errors...) > > I can't verify at the momemt the code _still_ works, but it really did > on a variety of CPUs at the time > of submit to mesa 5.1 :-) The detection code was tested on P4 & Athlon > CPUs for sure (by me) > and on different cpus by others with no complaints. > > Hope this helps... On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 12:55:38PM -0800, Nick Rusnov wrote: > > I have built r951 as specified in the previous email, and it seems to > have built successfully (no FTBFS). > > I haven't been able to test the packages yet, but it was said that > the critical part was seeing that it built at all, which it did. Thanks to you both for helping out with this! -- G. Branden Robinson | Fair use is irrelevant and Debian GNU/Linux | improper. branden@debian.org | -- Asst. U.S. Attorney Scott http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | Frewing, explaining the DMCA
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature