[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

debian/patches status: 024-030



024_ati_busmaster_vt_switch_hang_fix
------------------------------------
The code on this has *compeletely* changed upstream. The key point is this change: 367. When enabling PCI adapters, also enable their bus mastering capability;
      Consequently, deprecate xf86EnablePciBusMaster() (Marc La France).

This is at
xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/ati/r128_dri.c @ 1.24
xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/ati/radeon_dri.c @ 1.18
(and presumably other files were changed at the same time)

Perhaps this patch is irrelevant after that upstream change.
If not, obviously it would need a lot of work to update it.

026_tdfx_double_buffering_for_xvideo
------------------------------------
Present in upstream 4.3.0 (literally this patch):

 424. Add support for double-buffering to the tdfx driver's XVideo overlay
      support (#5415, Stephen Davies).

027_abnt2_keycode_fix
---------------------
This is just a comment patch!

A different and presumably more accurate comment patch went in upstream. for 4.3.0. In HEAD, lots of little changes have been made to this file, including some which touch the same code.

I would declare this irrelevant.

028_buffalo_proctology
----------------------
Patches several different yacc files with different fates. One (xc/lib/Xft/xftgram.y) doesn't exist in 3.4.0, and the rest of the patches are in upstream 3.4.0.

029_xdmcp_Wrap.h_fixes
----------------------
Not present upstream, apparently not in sid patches.
Should apply unchanged (since the file didn't change from 4.0 through 4.3 branch), but the patch needs a new number, of course. (A different and weirder change is in HEAD, but this patch looks more correct than that.)

030_ship_more_extension_headers
-------------------------------
Present in upstream 4.3.0:

xc/include/extensions/Imakefile @ 3.49
 406. Install extension struct/protocol headers that weren't already
      being installed (#5369, Branden Robinson).



Reply to: