Bug#285543: marked as done (xserver-xfree86: read-edid should be suggested only in i386)
Your message dated Fri, 31 Dec 2004 04:41:45 -0500
with message-id <20041231094145.GJ29940@redwald.deadbeast.net>
and subject line Bug#285543: xserver-xfree86: read-edid should be suggested only in i386
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Dec 2004 22:29:49 +0000
>From suy@badopi.org Mon Dec 13 14:29:49 2004
Return-path: <suy@badopi.org>
Received: from 34.red-80-32-129.pooles.rima-tde.net (stewie) [80.32.129.34]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CdyhR-00066r-00; Mon, 13 Dec 2004 14:29:49 -0800
Received: by stewie (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 8DF777A199; Mon, 13 Dec 2004 23:28:42 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Alejandro Exojo <suy@badopi.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: xserver-xfree86: read-edid should be suggested only in i386
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.4
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 23:28:42 +0100
Message-Id: <[🔎] 20041213222842.8DF777A199@stewie>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8
Severity: minor
Hi.
The package read-edid only exists in i386, but is suggested in all
archs.
TIA.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 285543-done) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Dec 2004 09:41:47 +0000
>From branden@redwald.deadbeast.net Fri Dec 31 01:41:47 2004
Return-path: <branden@redwald.deadbeast.net>
Received: from dhcp065-026-182-085.indy.rr.com (sisyphus.deadbeast.net) [65.26.182.85]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CkJI2-0006NL-00; Fri, 31 Dec 2004 01:41:46 -0800
Received: by sisyphus.deadbeast.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id BDD5568C055; Fri, 31 Dec 2004 04:41:45 -0500 (EST)
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2004 04:41:45 -0500
From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>
To: 285543-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#285543: xserver-xfree86: read-edid should be suggested only in i386
Message-ID: <20041231094145.GJ29940@redwald.deadbeast.net>
References: <[🔎] 20041213222842.8DF777A199@stewie>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="RL02At1kLqUPtqvA"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 20041213222842.8DF777A199@stewie>
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
X-No-CC: I subscribe to this list; do not CC me on replies.
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: 285543-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER,
VALID_BTS_CONTROL autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
--RL02At1kLqUPtqvA
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
tag 285543 + wontfix
thanks
On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 11:28:42PM +0100, Alejandro Exojo wrote:
> Package: xserver-xfree86
> Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8
> Severity: minor
>=20
> Hi.
>=20
> The package read-edid only exists in i386, but is suggested in all
> archs.
There's no rule against that, and if I ever get around to uploading a new
version of read-edid (or someone takes me up on my request to NMU it),
read-edid will exist for powerpc as well.
Closing this bug.
--=20
G. Branden Robinson |
Debian GNU/Linux | Cogitationis poenam nemo meretur.
branden@debian.org |
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
--RL02At1kLqUPtqvA
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkHVHtkACgkQ6kxmHytGonxSQQCdEgy6qQqu9baXtHKfMZ7Fj2G6
gBIAn2KCZBq+v5+uef+3ccK/speT6DG0
=89YN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--RL02At1kLqUPtqvA--
Reply to: