On Fri, Dec 10, 2004 at 10:35:26AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > On Fri, Dec 10, 2004 at 04:01:46AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > Apparently you haven't looked at the TODO on the debconf-overhaul branch > > for several weeks: > > > > 1928 branden + #253607: Accept blank values for monitor sync ranges, which will omit these > > 1928 branden parameters from the config file, relying upon the X server's DDC routines to > > 1928 branden figure them out. Add warning to template that results might be suboptimal > > 1928 branden if this is done (XFree86 falls back to *very* conservative timings if DDC > > 1928 branden probing fails). > > > > So, essentially, you don't have to waste any more time trying to persuade > > me. :) > > Cool, but i suppose this is too late for sarge, right ? Not necessarily. The question is, can I get enough testers for the debconf-overhaul branch for us to be confident in it in time for sarge? That remains to be seen. -- G. Branden Robinson | One doesn't have a sense of humor. Debian GNU/Linux | It has you. branden@debian.org | -- Larry Gelbart http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature