Bug#263952: marked as done (xserver-xfree86: rendering problems with xclock on some XINERAMA screens)
Your message dated Wed, 8 Dec 2004 00:51:08 -0500
with message-id <20041208055108.GR29501@redwald.deadbeast.net>
and subject line Bug#263952: Pointers and Scale are invisible on secondary XINERAMA screens
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Aug 2004 11:46:10 +0000
>From jbglaw@dvmwest.gt.owl.de Fri Aug 06 04:46:10 2004
Return-path: <jbglaw@dvmwest.gt.owl.de>
Received: from dvmwest.gt.owl.de [62.52.24.140]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Bt3An-0000qV-00; Fri, 06 Aug 2004 04:46:09 -0700
Received: by dvmwest.gt.owl.de (Postfix, from userid 1001)
id BCB1E4B791; Fri, 6 Aug 2004 13:46:07 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 13:46:07 +0200
From: Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbglaw@lug-owl.de>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Pointers and Scale are invisible on secondary XINERAMA screens
Message-ID: <20040806114607.GH30773@lug-owl.de>
Mail-Followup-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="STPqjqpCrtky8aYs"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Operating-System: Linux mail 2.4.18
X-gpg-fingerprint: 250D 3BCF 7127 0D8C A444 A961 1DBD 5E75 8399 E1BB
X-gpg-key: wwwkeys.de.pgp.net
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
--STPqjqpCrtky8aYs
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: xbase-clients
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6
Distribution: sid
Architecture: i386
Hi!
If I start xclock on my xinerama screen (three horizontally ordered
CRTs), hour and minute pointers and the outer scale are only visible
when the window in on the middle screen (which is the "primary" screen
of the three. The other two are declared as LeftOf/RightOf the middle
one.)
MfG, JBG
--=20
Jan-Benedict Glaw jbglaw@lug-owl.de . +49-172-7608481 =
_ O _
"Eine Freie Meinung in einem Freien Kopf | Gegen Zensur | Gegen Krieg =
_ _ O
fuer einen Freien Staat voll Freier B=FCrger" | im Internet! | im Irak! =
O O O
ret =3D do_actions((curr | FREE_SPEECH) & ~(NEW_COPYRIGHT_LAW | DRM | TCPA)=
);
--STPqjqpCrtky8aYs
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBE29/Hb1edYOZ4bsRApsKAJ4tFG9XPdCeI0djbsQRcA7KudMfVwCfcoBC
5gJXtQLBqaW3mNo9pBjE70A=
=zg7d
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--STPqjqpCrtky8aYs--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 263952-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Dec 2004 05:51:09 +0000
>From branden@redwald.deadbeast.net Tue Dec 07 21:51:09 2004
Return-path: <branden@redwald.deadbeast.net>
Received: from dhcp065-026-182-085.indy.rr.com (sisyphus.deadbeast.net) [65.26.182.85]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CbujF-0003RO-00; Tue, 07 Dec 2004 21:51:09 -0800
Received: by sisyphus.deadbeast.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id C28DF68C070; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 00:51:08 -0500 (EST)
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 00:51:08 -0500
From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>
To: 263952-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#263952: Pointers and Scale are invisible on secondary XINERAMA screens
Message-ID: <20041208055108.GR29501@redwald.deadbeast.net>
References: <20040806114607.GH30773@lug-owl.de> <20040901095517.GO16490@redwald.deadbeast.net> <20041012134340.GZ5033@lug-owl.de> <1097641484.4421.46.camel@admin.tel.thor.asgaard.local> <20041013133741.GP5033@lug-owl.de> <1097813459.4290.59.camel@admin.tel.thor.asgaard.local> <20041015093805.GZ5033@lug-owl.de> <20041018094603.GD7091@redwald.deadbeast.net> <1098111931.4370.35.camel@admin.tel.thor.asgaard.local> <20041025122546.GE26244@redwald.deadbeast.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Pq8tEKHpn00JYbZk"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20041025122546.GE26244@redwald.deadbeast.net>
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
X-No-CC: I subscribe to this list; do not CC me on replies.
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: 263952-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
--Pq8tEKHpn00JYbZk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 07:25:46AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 11:05:31AM -0400, Michel D=E4nzer wrote:
> > On Mon, 2004-10-18 at 04:46 -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 15, 2004 at 11:38:05AM +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2004-10-15 00:10:59 -0400, Michel D=E4nzer <daenzer@debian.=
org>
> > > > wrote in message <1097813459.4290.59.camel@admin.tel.thor.asgaard.l=
ocal>:
> > > > >=20
> > > > > Let's get another random data point: does it also happen if you r=
un
> > > > > xclock with -norender?
> > > >=20
> > > > No; with -norender, everything works as expected.
> > >=20
> > > Michel, can you tell me how to transform this data point into a Eureka
> > > moment? :)
> >=20
> > Not sure; it means the problem seems to be related to the RENDER
> > extension. Maybe the atimisc driver doesn't initialize that correctly.
> > It would still be interesting to know if the order of the screens
> > matters.
>=20
> Dear submitter,
>=20
> Can you please tell us if the order of the screens matters?
Asked submitter for more information on 25 October.
No reply in 6 weeks.
Closing report from unresponsive submitter.
--=20
G. Branden Robinson | It doesn't matter what you are
Debian GNU/Linux | doing, emacs is always overkill.
branden@debian.org | -- Stephen J. Carpenter
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
--Pq8tEKHpn00JYbZk
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkG2lkwACgkQ6kxmHytGonzSvgCfRo3PulyQhY5g/cvaVr/OAMX1
hAAAoItYUz/WDDw3jcRX05Hy1mRW+jtB
=GjH3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Pq8tEKHpn00JYbZk--
Reply to: