Bug#270810: /etc/X11/xkb/rules/xfree86 does not list all old layout files
tags 270810 + patch
# 271259 already has a patch, but its tag was forgotten
tags 271259 + patch
thanks
On Sun, Sep 12, 2004 at 05:41:22PM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote:
> Stefan Kluth wrote:
> > The gnome keyboard preferences panel, accessed through the keyboard
> > indicator applet, does not manage to load "us_intl" as keyboard layout.
> > Instead, a error report window pops up, but the content is not helpful.
>
> Please discard my previous comments, I had a closer look to this issue
> and found that:
> a. XFree86 upstream introduced a multi-layout version of us_intl
> after 4.3.0
> b. Some old layout keymaps are not listed in /etc/X11/xkb/rules/xfree86
Here is a patch for (b), all layouts only available under the old format
are now listed. Since this is only a consistency checking, I would like
to merge this patch with #271259.
Can I commit it?
Denis
$Id$
This patch by Denis Barbier.
List in $oldlayouts all layouts which are currently not available
in xlibs Debian package under the new format. Closes: #271259
It also adds the lv3:ralt_switch option which does exist in xfree86.lst
but was forgotten in this file.
diff -ruN xc-old/programs/xkbcomp/rules/xfree86 xc/programs/xkbcomp/rules/xfree86
--- xc-old/programs/xkbcomp/rules/xfree86 Thu Sep 16 17:03:12 2004
+++ xc/programs/xkbcomp/rules/xfree86 Fri Sep 17 14:26:43 2004
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
//
// Layouts that still need be composed by old rules
-! $oldlayouts = az bs ca ca_enhanced de_CH fr_CH hu hu_qwerty lt_std mn vn hr_US
+! $oldlayouts = az bs ca ca_enhanced de_CH fr_CH hr_US hu hu_qwerty jp lt_std mn ru_yawerty se_FI se_NO se_SE tr_f us_intl vn
// If you want non-latin layouts implicitly include the en_US layout
// uncomment lines below
@@ -157,6 +157,7 @@
lv3:win_switch = +level3(win_switch)
lv3:lwin_switch = +level3(lwin_switch)
lv3:rwin_switch = +level3(rwin_switch)
+ lv3:ralt_switch = +level3(ralt_switch)
ctrl:nocaps = +ctrl(nocaps)
ctrl:swapcaps = +ctrl(swapcaps)
ctrl:ctrl_ac = +ctrl(ctrl_ac)
Reply to: