[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[davem@davemloft.net: Re: more on xserver-xfree86]



I think the patch for sparc to allow scanning the newer style PCI proc
domain entries has broken 2.4's PCI scanning.

----- Forwarded message from "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> -----

From: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
To: Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org>
Subject: Re: more on xserver-xfree86
X-Face: "_;p5u5aPsO,_Vsx"^v-pEq09'CU4&Dc1$fQExov$62l60cgCc%FnIwD=.UF^a>?5'9Kn[;433QFVV9M..2eN.@4ZWPGbdi<=?[:T>y?SD(R*-3It"Vj:)"dP
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on 
	bristol.swissdisk.com
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.4 required=4.9 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SUBJ_HAS_UNIQ_ID 
	autolearn=no version=2.64

On Tue, 7 Sep 2004 11:58:18 -0400
Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org> wrote:

> On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 09:24:30AM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> > 
> > Very strange, it doesn't crash with 2.6.x kernels but it does with
> > 2.4.28, :-/
> 
> I wonder if the change to get the PCI domain scanning for 2.6 broke the
> 2.4 method.

That sounds like a hot clue to me :)

----- End forwarded message -----

-- 
Debian     - http://www.debian.org/
Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/
Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/
WatchGuard - http://www.watchguard.com/



Reply to: