[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#261544: xserver-xfree86: sigalarm/sigreturn deadlock



retitle 261544 xserver-xfree86: X server uses C library's alarm() function
tag 261544 + moreinfo upstream
thanks

On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 10:44:22AM -0600, for debian bts wrote:
> Package: xserver-xfree86
> Version: 4.1.0-16woody3
> Severity: normal
> 
> strace shows this activity:
> 
> --- SIGALRM (Alarm clock) ---
> sigreturn()                             = ? (mask now [])
> --- SIGALRM (Alarm clock) ---
> sigreturn()                             = ? (mask now [])
> --- SIGALRM (Alarm clock) ---
> sigreturn()                             = ? (mask now [])
> --- SIGALRM (Alarm clock) ---
> sigreturn()                             = ? (mask now [])
> --- SIGALRM (Alarm clock) ---
> sigreturn()                             = ? (mask now [])
> 
> I can hold our for a day or two, and run commands via gdb
> to gather more information if you like.  Let me know, so
> I can be up and running if the report becomes superficial.

What is the problem you are experiencing?

The above looks exactly like what I would expect to see for an application
using alarm(2).

> btw, my hotmail address is cvgscote. I refuse to post an actual email address
> like supaplex@pcbkits.com in the plain on bts, because I receive too much spam
> (that's a spam trap now anyway...)  Please see that you do not repost my actual
> email address, or allow it to be posted in anyway. (this will prevent evil
> robots from scraping up my email ... )

Er, by submitting this bug report, the text of your message went to at
least two different public mailing lists.

-- 
G. Branden Robinson                |     If you have the slightest bit of
Debian GNU/Linux                   |     intellectual integrity you cannot
branden@debian.org                 |     support the government.
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |     -- anonymous

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: