Processed: retitle 261620 to xserver-xfree86: [ati/radeon] radeon(4x) needs better documentation of ForceMinDotClock option ... ...

To: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>
Cc: Debian X Strike Force <debian-x@lists.debian.org>(xserver-xfree86 #261620)
Subject: Processed: retitle 261620 to xserver-xfree86: [ati/radeon] radeon(4x) needs better documentation of ForceMinDotClock option ... ...
From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 01:33:41 -0700
Message-id: <[🔎] handler.s.C.109238074431060.transcript@bugs.debian.org>
In-reply-to: <20040813070543.4ED2A68C01D@sisyphus.deadbeast.net>
References: <20040813070543.4ED2A68C01D@sisyphus.deadbeast.net>

Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.1
> retitle 261620 xserver-xfree86: [ati/radeon] radeon(4x) needs better documentation of ForceMinDotClock option
Bug#261620: Radeon: ForceMinDotClock has no effect.
Changed Bug title.

> severity 261620 minor
Bug#261620: xserver-xfree86: [ati/radeon] radeon(4x) needs better documentation of ForceMinDotClock option
Severity set to `minor'.

> tags 261620 + upstream
Bug#261620: xserver-xfree86: [ati/radeon] radeon(4x) needs better documentation of ForceMinDotClock option
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Reply to:

Prev by Date: Processed: Re: Bug#261620: Radeon: ForceMinDotClock has no effect.
Next by Date: Processed: Re: Bug#19538: marked as done (xterm: resize not handled by both primary and alternate screens)
Previous by thread: Processed: retitle 261619 to xserver-xfree86: [ati/radeon] want MergedFB support from X.Org CVS, tagging 261619
Next by thread: Bug#261620: Radeon: ForceMinDotClock has no effect.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread