On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 06:05:41AM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin wrote: > Stop shipping duplicate doc/specs in xterm.doc. Fabio, Please revert that part of the commit before merging it onto the trunk (or convince me you're right :) ). If not sure shipping (non-overlapping) duplicates is harmful in this case, but if you disagree, xterm is a more appropriate package for ctlseqs.ms and the files generated from it than xspecs is. This is because I think people are going to look for the document describing the control sequences supported by XTerm in /usr/share/doc/xterm before they look in /usr/share/doc/xspecs. Also, upstream ctlseqs.ms is in xc/programs/xterm, so if/when we split xterm off from the monolithic X SI package, XTerm (Thomas Dickey) is going to be our upstream for that document. -- G. Branden Robinson | Somebody once asked me if I thought Debian GNU/Linux | sex was dirty. I said, "It is if branden@debian.org | you're doing it right." http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Woody Allen
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature