X Strike Force XFree86 SVN commit: r1565 - in trunk/debian: . local
Author: branden
Date: 2004-06-23 17:31:58 -0500 (Wed, 23 Jun 2004)
New Revision: 1565
Modified:
trunk/debian/CHANGESETS
trunk/debian/local/FAQ.xhtml
Log:
(cosmetic) Don't capitalize "project" when referring to XFree86 except when
using the organization's full corporation name.
(cosmetic) Fix missing word.
Modified: trunk/debian/CHANGESETS
===================================================================
--- trunk/debian/CHANGESETS 2004-06-23 22:28:15 UTC (rev 1564)
+++ trunk/debian/CHANGESETS 2004-06-23 22:31:58 UTC (rev 1565)
@@ -53,6 +53,6 @@
Add FAQ entries:
+ What is the story with XFree86 being forked?
+ What is the story with XFree86's license?
- 1562, 1563, 1564
+ 1562, 1563, 1564, 1565
vim:set ai et sts=4 sw=4 tw=80:
Modified: trunk/debian/local/FAQ.xhtml
===================================================================
--- trunk/debian/local/FAQ.xhtml 2004-06-23 22:28:15 UTC (rev 1564)
+++ trunk/debian/local/FAQ.xhtml 2004-06-23 22:31:58 UTC (rev 1565)
@@ -208,7 +208,7 @@
Window System.</li>
</ul>
-<p>(There used to be an XFree86 FAQ, which was published by the XFree86 Project,
+<p>(There used to be an XFree86 FAQ, which was published by the XFree86 project,
but unfortunately it has not been maintained for quite some time.)</p>
<p>Like all other documentation, these FAQs are in
@@ -393,7 +393,7 @@
<p>An <a href="http://www.linux-mag.com/2001-12/xfree86_01.html">article</a> by
Michael J. Hammel in the December 2001 issue of <em>Linux Magazine</em> contains
-a fairly comprehensive history of the XFree86 Project to up to that point in
+a fairly comprehensive history of the XFree86 project to up to that point in
time.</p>
<h3><a id="xfree86fork">What is the story with XFree86 being forked?</a></h3>
@@ -470,10 +470,10 @@
form) under the GNU GPL with code under the new XFree86 license.</p>
<p>On top of this, when OS distributors have requested clarification as to the
-precise and practical meaning of XFree86's new license from the XFree86, they
-have often found the replies insufficiently elucidating. A license that is not
-understood is not safe enough for most organizations to deal with — for
-fear of civil or criminal claims of copyright infringement — hence the
+precise and practical meaning of XFree86's new license from the XFree86 project,
+they have often found the replies insufficiently elucidating. A license that is
+not understood is not safe enough for most organizations to deal with —
+for fear of civil or criminal claims of copyright infringement — hence the
decision by many OS vendors, including Debian, to avoid code under this
license.</p>
Reply to: