[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#247444: marked as done (xlibmesa-gl: fails to install: dpkg (subprocess): unable to execute post-installation script: Exec format error)



Your message dated Wed, 12 May 2004 04:17:33 -0500
with message-id <20040512091733.GL18044@deadbeast.net>
and subject line Bug#247444: xlibmesa-gl: fails to install (dpkg error)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 May 2004 07:35:19 +0000
>From ben@gouarec.com Wed May 05 00:35:19 2004
Return-path: <ben@gouarec.com>
Received: from dyn-83-157-188-36.ppp.tiscali.fr (caroline.gouarec.com) [83.157.188.36] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BLGw2-00049n-00; Wed, 05 May 2004 00:35:19 -0700
Received: from root by caroline.gouarec.com with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 1BLGvx-0001Dl-00; Wed, 05 May 2004 09:35:13 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: ben <ben@gouarec.com>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: xlibmesa-gl: fails to install (dpkg error)
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.58
Date: Wed, 05 May 2004 09:35:13 +0200
Message-Id: <[🔎] E1BLGvx-0001Dl-00@caroline.gouarec.com>
X-BadReturnPath: root@caroline rewritten as ben@gouarec.com
  using "From" header
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1

Package: xlibmesa-gl
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-1
Severity: important

dpkg error when installing the package :

Setting up xlibmesa-gl (4.3.0.dfsg.1-1) ...
dpkg (subprocess): unable to execute post-installation script: Exec format error
dpkg: error processing xlibmesa-gl (--configure):
 subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 2

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.3
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8

Versions of packages xlibmesa-gl depends on:
ii  libc6                     2.3.2.ds1-12   GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libxext6                  4.3.0.dfsg.1-1 X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii  xlibs                     4.3.0.dfsg.1-1 X Window System client libraries m

-- no debconf information

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 247444-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 May 2004 09:17:34 +0000
>From branden@deadbeast.net Wed May 12 02:17:34 2004
Return-path: <branden@deadbeast.net>
Received: from dhcp065-026-182-085.indy.rr.com (redwald.deadbeast.net) [65.26.182.85] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BNprq-0005En-00; Wed, 12 May 2004 02:17:34 -0700
Received: by redwald.deadbeast.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 70CDF6415F; Wed, 12 May 2004 04:17:33 -0500 (EST)
Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 04:17:33 -0500
From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>
To: 247444-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#247444: xlibmesa-gl: fails to install (dpkg error)
Message-ID: <20040512091733.GL18044@deadbeast.net>
References: <[🔎] E1BLGvx-0001Dl-00@caroline.gouarec.com> <[🔎] 20040510213411.GV8186@deadbeast.net> <[🔎] 20040511001150.000008e0@caroline>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="7l042bGvurpep9Wg"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 20040511001150.000008e0@caroline>
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
X-No-CC: I subscribe to this list; do not CC me on replies.
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
Delivered-To: 247444-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1


--7l042bGvurpep9Wg
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 12:11:50AM +0200, Beno=EEt M=E9rouze wrote:
> On Mon, 10 May 2004 16:34:11 -0500
> Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org> wrote:
> > Bizarre.  I have not seen this, nor have many other x86 users.
> >=20
> > Can you please mail this bug (247444@bugs.debian.org) the output of the
> > following commands?:
> >=20
> > $ file /var/lib/dpkg/info/xlibmesa-gl.postinst
> > $ head /var/lib/dpkg/info/xlibmesa-gl.postinst
> >=20
>=20
> This problem has been resolved since my last 'apt-get upgrade' this morni=
ng.
> I don't know what corrected it, but I had the problem with my two machines
> during the last week.
>=20
> I think the bug can be closed.

Okay.  I wonder what happened.

Closing as unreproducible per submitter.

Thanks for following up!

--=20
G. Branden Robinson                |    I reverse the phrase of Voltaire,
Debian GNU/Linux                   |    and say that if God really existed,
branden@debian.org                 |    it would be necessary to abolish
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |    him.             -- Mikhail Bakunin

--7l042bGvurpep9Wg
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkCh660ACgkQ6kxmHytGonyv4gCeIwooowHa0H4z3ok28Mf8+sOW
uiYAoJmb+aK+uOsX2/dbuXkXQQDRXMmb
=fTGL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--7l042bGvurpep9Wg--



Reply to: