Bug#159325: marked as done (xbase-clients: xload doesn't support -geometry information)
Your message dated Tue, 30 Mar 2004 03:57:36 -0500
with message-id <20040330085736.GU10706@deadbeast.net>
and subject line Bug#159325: 159325: fixed (xload -geometry problem)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Sep 2002 15:56:17 +0000
>From gun@home.gunix.de Mon Sep 02 10:56:17 2002
Return-path: <gun@home.gunix.de>
Received: from mailout08.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.20]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17ltYn-0002BM-00; Mon, 02 Sep 2002 10:56:17 -0500
Received: from fwd10.sul.t-online.de
by mailout08.sul.t-online.com with smtp
id 17ltYl-0000Yj-02; Mon, 02 Sep 2002 17:56:15 +0200
Received: from obelix.home.gunix.de (320098865073-0001@[193.159.135.32]) by fmrl10.sul.t-online.com
with esmtp id 17ltYT-1gxSOOC; Mon, 2 Sep 2002 17:55:57 +0200
Received: from asterix.home.gunix.de (root@asterix.home.gunix.de [192.168.13.10])
by obelix.home.gunix.de (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian -4) with ESMTP id g82FtsEh025055
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=FAIL);
Mon, 2 Sep 2002 17:55:55 +0200
Received: from asterix.home.gunix.de (gun@localhost [127.0.0.1])
by asterix.home.gunix.de (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian -4) with ESMTP id g82FtrBb019260
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=FAIL);
Mon, 2 Sep 2002 17:55:53 +0200
Received: (from gun@localhost)
by asterix.home.gunix.de (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian -4) id g82Ftigq019256;
Mon, 2 Sep 2002 17:55:44 +0200
Message-Id: <200209021555.g82Ftigq019256@asterix.home.gunix.de>
From: Alexander Gun <gun@home.gunix.de>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: xbase-clients: xload doesn't support -geometry information
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2002 17:55:44 +0200
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter (http://amavis.org/)
X-Sender: 320098865073-0001@t-dialin.net
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Package: xbase-clients
Version: 4.1.0-16
Severity: minor
xload -help says:
-geometry geom size and location of window
but in the manpage there is nothing about this parameter
and xload doesnt support it.
mfg
ag
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux asterix 2.4.19 #1 Sam Aug 3 11:02:44 CEST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=de_DE, LC_CTYPE=de_DE
Versions of packages xbase-clients depends on:
ii cpp 2:2.95.4-14 The GNU C preprocessor.
ii debconf 1.0.32 Debian configuration management sy
ii libc6 2.2.5-11.1 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libdps1 4.1.0-16 Display PostScript (DPS) client li
ii libfreetype6 2.0.9-1 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
ii libncurses5 5.2.20020112a-7 Shared libraries for terminal hand
ii libxaw7 4.1.0-16 X Athena widget set library
ii xlibmesa3 4.1.0-16 XFree86 version of Mesa 3D graphic
ii xlibmesa3 [libgl1] 4.1.0-16 XFree86 version of Mesa 3D graphic
ii xlibs 4.1.0-16 X Window System client libraries
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 159325-done) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Mar 2004 08:57:38 +0000
>From branden@deadbeast.net Tue Mar 30 00:57:38 2004
Return-path: <branden@deadbeast.net>
Received: from dhcp065-026-182-085.indy.rr.com (redwald.deadbeast.net) [65.26.182.85]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1B8F3y-0003Gp-00; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 00:57:38 -0800
Received: by redwald.deadbeast.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 41B7D6419E; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 03:57:36 -0500 (EST)
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 03:57:36 -0500
From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>
To: 159325-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#159325: 159325: fixed (xload -geometry problem)
Message-ID: <20040330085736.GU10706@deadbeast.net>
References: <[🔎] Pine.GSO.4.33.0403282213260.26071-100000@ptah.u.arizona.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="MTFjS3R2zZZVGaSB"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] Pine.GSO.4.33.0403282213260.26071-100000@ptah.u.arizona.edu>
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
X-No-CC: I subscribe to this list; do not CC me on replies.
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Delivered-To: 159325-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
--MTFjS3R2zZZVGaSB
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sun, Mar 28, 2004 at 10:20:02PM -0700, Andre Lehovich wrote:
> Alexander Gun <gun@home.gunix.de> wrote in #159325:
> > xload -help says:
> > -geometry geom size and location of window
> >
> > but in the manpage there is nothing about this parameter
> > and xload doesnt support it.
>=20
> This is not an issue in 4.1.3. The standard toolkit option
(I think Andre meant "4.3.0".)
> -geometry does work, and is documented in X(7x), which is
> referenced from xload(1x).
Closing as fixed upstream in 4.3.0 (at the latest).
Thanks, Andre!
--=20
G. Branden Robinson | If God had intended for man to go
Debian GNU/Linux | about naked, we would have been
branden@debian.org | born that way.
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
--MTFjS3R2zZZVGaSB
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkBpNn8ACgkQ6kxmHytGonz4IACdGy8UptRuFfXAm2t6bKd6hDcA
lucAnR7v6zL3LSLue3IElB3CeIbMahtw
=d+iA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--MTFjS3R2zZZVGaSB--
Reply to: