[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#239668: Bug #239668: xserver-xfree86: Elf_RelocateEntry() Unsupported relocation type 0 on i386



Just to follow up, it appears that I was indeed rather premature with this report (but you all knew that anyway). I acted too hastily. I had just upgraded the xfree86 packages, and went to restart my x session and X crashed. After a little bit of debugging, and seeing a similar report on Alpha, I added another bug. I assumed that since the package simply did not start, that it qualified as a serious bug (I believe that a package that does not start in its default configuration is a serious violation of policy, but I can't find the reference now).

In hindsight, I should have been more thoughtful. The package was, first of all, not in its default configuration, obviously, since I have spent time customizing my XF86Config-4 file. Secondly, I didn't check to see how long the package had been out before filing the report.

Anyway, I downloaded xserver-xfree86-dbg in the hopes of finding out more information, and it started just fine. I redownloaded the standard 4.3.0-7 package, and it too worked just fine. I'm not sure exactly what the problem was on my system that day, but the very same package is working fine now.

So, now that I'm sufficiently embarrassed, I'm going to recommend that this bug be closed, and start a thorough reading of the Debian Policy Manual, as well as promise to behave more sensibly in the future.

Anthony W. Juckel

ps. Perhaps I should have just sat back and got a nice warm cup of shut the f**k up :-) At least until I had verified it with a couple other users...

Branden Robinson wrote:
Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.3.0-7
Severity: serious

I've made the severity serious, since it appeared initially that X was
completely unable to start.  It turns out that the error is
encountered upon loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libxaa.a.  After
enabling NoAccel in my XF86Config-4, I got the server to start again.

I would appreciate if someone (with similar hardware, if necessary)
could attempt to reproduce this bug.  There has been no change in my
hardware or configuration (other than upgrading to the latest
unstable) since X last functioned with hardware acceleration enabled.





Reply to: