tag 238666 + help upstream thanks On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 12:41:07PM -0800, Daniel Schepler wrote: > Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org> writes: > > > This is SO WRONG ... Xosdefs.h thinks that the presence of a definition > > of SX means that it's running on some strange non-POSIX PC Unix clone or > > other, and goes into crazy mode. If I rename SX to something else, it's > > fine. > > > > I'll apply a workaround to kali, but this is hideous namespace pollution > > on the part of Xosdefs.h. Can we just ditch most of that file in Debian? > > The __GNU__ bit at the end is the only part that seems possibly > > relevant. > > It also appears that defining SYSV does the same thing (see bug > #238628). That definitely seems wrong, since SYSV does (sort of) > apply to GNU/Linux systems. I'd appreciate some assistance with this bug, as I'd be loath to mess around with a fundamental (for X) header file in the first place, let alone when we're trying to do a freeze. -- G. Branden Robinson | There's something wrong if you're Debian GNU/Linux | always right. branden@debian.org | -- Glasow's Law http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature