X Strike Force XFree86 SVN commit: r1124 - trunk/debian
Author: branden
Date: 2004-03-02 14:05:03 -0500 (Tue, 02 Mar 2004)
New Revision: 1124
Modified:
trunk/debian/changelog
trunk/debian/shell-lib.sh
Log:
Fix non-POSIX-compliant syntax when placing a here document inside a shell
expansion (thanks to Colin Watson for ruling out a bug in in some shell
interpreters). (Closes: #235687)
Modified: trunk/debian/changelog
===================================================================
--- trunk/debian/changelog 2004-03-02 17:58:12 UTC (rev 1123)
+++ trunk/debian/changelog 2004-03-02 19:05:03 UTC (rev 1124)
@@ -1,5 +1,9 @@
-xfree86 (4.3.0-4) unstable; urgency=low
+xfree86 (4.3.0-4) unstable; urgency=medium
+ * Urgency due to fix for grave bug which prevents packages from installing
+ on systems where shells other than bash, ksh, or posh are used for
+ /bin/sh.
+
* Fix missing non-breaking spaces (thanks, Christian Perrier).
- debian/po/fr.po
@@ -26,8 +30,13 @@
POSIX-compatible shell interpreters.
- debian/scripts/validate-posix-sh
- -- Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org> Tue, 2 Mar 2004 12:51:46 -0500
+ * Fix non-POSIX-compliant syntax when placing a here document inside a shell
+ expansion (thanks to Colin Watson for ruling out a bug in in some shell
+ interpreters). (Closes: #235687)
+ - debian/shell-lib.sh
+ -- Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org> Tue, 2 Mar 2004 14:04:13 -0500
+
xfree86 (4.3.0-3) unstable; urgency=medium
* Urgency due to fix for serious bug which frustrates removal of library
Modified: trunk/debian/shell-lib.sh
===================================================================
--- trunk/debian/shell-lib.sh 2004-03-02 17:58:12 UTC (rev 1123)
+++ trunk/debian/shell-lib.sh 2004-03-02 19:05:03 UTC (rev 1124)
@@ -249,7 +249,8 @@
this file overlap, please file a bug against that package with the Debian Bug
Tracking System. You may want to refer the package maintainer to section 12.8
of the Debian Policy manual.
-EOF)
+EOF
+)
message "$msg"
message "The overlapping packages are: $bad_packages"
else
Reply to: