Re: Question on X and new license...
- To: debian-x@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Question on X and new license...
- From: Dominique Dumont <dominique.dumont@freesbee.fr>
- Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 22:18:09 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 87k725a8ku.fsf@freesbee.fr>
- In-reply-to: <20040223044324.GE697@deadbeast.net> (Branden Robinson's message of "Sun, 22 Feb 2004 23:43:24 -0500")
- References: <40396807.4000107@realitydiluted.com> <20040223044324.GE697@deadbeast.net>
Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org> writes:
> (Fellow debian-x subscribers: I'd like your feedback on this message, as
> once debian-legal has made its decision regarding the DFSG-freeness of
> the X-Oz license, I'd like to re-purpose it, perhaps as a mail to
> debian-devel-announce and/or as a position statement to placed on the X
> Strike Force news page. If any contributor to Debian's X packaging has
> any objection to the above statements, please speak up.)
Looks like the issue revolves arounf the advertisement of Xfree86.
OK, I may be naive, but could we suggest Xfree's owners that they can
handle their own advertising without the X-oz licence: When Xfree
starts, there's always 1 oe 2 seconds of a grey mesh. Why don't they
place their advertising here. The advert could last one or 2 seconds
or the time required for [xkw]dm to start.
This way, they would have their advertising without changing the
licenses or impacting Xfree developers.
Cheers
(I really hope not to start a flame war ...)
Reply to: