[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Processed: This isn't new



tag 234788 - upstream
thanks

On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 10:03:06AM -0800, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:
> 
> > tag 234788 sid sarge woody upstream
> Bug#234788: Major data loss because of .xsession-errors
> There were no tags set.
> Tags added: sid, sarge, woody, upstream
> 
> > thanks
> Stopping processing here.

Sigh.  The copy of this mail to Nathanael will bounce because his ISP is
spiteful and evil.

Nathanael,

The definitions of the "sid", "sarge", and "woody" tags are such that
they mean a bug "specifically" applies to a release.  Thus, it doesn't
make sense to apply these specific tags universally.  No information is
communicated.

Also, this isn't an upstream.  It isn't anybody's problem, as far as I
can tell apart from the misbehaving app on the submitter's system that
thought it would be amusing to spew 1.5GB of data to stdout stderr.

-- 
G. Branden Robinson                |    For every credibility gap, there is
Debian GNU/Linux                   |    a gullibility fill.
branden@debian.org                 |    -- Richard Clopton
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: