[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#234066: xserver-xfree86: XF86Config-4 file not being used correctly



On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 07:49:38AM -0500, Luke Schierer wrote:
> Okay, so now I have my XF86Config-4 automatically managed again, and it 
> still hasn't solved the root problem:  I only looked at having it 
> re-written thinking something had changed and that re-writting it from 
> the config would get it so that i can control my resolution again.  With 
> the config file as pasted in my first report by reportbug, I have a 
> desktop that is 209 characters wide in a very small font, I'm not sure 
> which of the following resolutions I'm running as I know I've hit 
> control-alt-- or control-alt-+ at least once: "1600x1200" "1280x1024" 
> "1280x960" "1152x864".   however, with either that config file or the 
> one that dpkg-reconfigure is now generating both with and without using 
> the kernel frame buffer device (not sure if that is relevent), I'm 
> getting a desktop which is about 227 characters wide, but which i can 
> only see approx 88 of them at a time. pressing control-alt-- and 
> control-alt-+ do not have any visisble affect on the size of the windows 
> (gkrellm, the aterm i'd opened to measure the size with, and the few 
> dock apps that start do not change apparance).  
> 
> I do not see anything in the faq you have pasted the url to below about 
> this.  It covers things for nvidia drivers and another kind, m 
> something, neither of which I'm using, but nothing about the ati 
> drivers that you all provide. 

Okay, now would be a good time to send along the XFree86.0.log file you
deleted from your original report.

Please mail it to <234066@bugs.debian.org>.

-- 
G. Branden Robinson                |    For every credibility gap, there is
Debian GNU/Linux                   |    a gullibility fill.
branden@debian.org                 |    -- Richard Clopton
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: