[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Stupid build failures for XFree86 4.3.0-2



On Thu, 2004-02-19 at 08:31, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 01:20:56PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> > >From the i386 buildd log:
> > >The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> > >  groff: Depends: libxaw7 (> 4.1.0) but it is not going to be installed
> > >         Depends: xlibs (> 4.1.0) but it is not going to be installed
> > >  libglide2-dev: Depends: libglide2 but it is not going to be installed
> > >  libglide3-dev: Depends: libglide3 but it is not going to be installed
> > >  libxcursor-dev: Depends: libxcursor1 (= 1.0.2-4) but it is not going to be installed
> > >                  Depends: xlibs-dev but it is not going to be installed
> > >  libxft-dev: Depends: libxft2 (= 2.1.2-5) but it is not going to be installed
> > >              Depends: xlibs-dev but it is not going to be installed
> > >  libxrender-dev: Depends: libxrender1 (= 0.8.3-5) but it is not going to be installed
> > >                  Depends: xlibs-dev but it is not going to be installed
> > >                  Depends: render-dev but it is not going to be installed
> > >  tetex-bin: Depends: libxaw7 (> 4.1.0) but it is not going to be installed
> > >             Depends: t1lib1 but it is not going to be installed
> > >             Depends: xlibs (> 4.1.0) but it is not going to be installed
> > 
> > Gah?  All of these look bogus to a lesser or greater extent, but what needs
> > to be done about them?
> 
> James Troup, on IRC and a few of the porting lists, speculated that this
> is a buildd problem, and gave instructions for working around it.
> 
> I asked him if he thought it was due a packaging bug, and he wasn't sure
> but seemed to think it probably wasn't.
> 
> The package seems to be perfectly buildable in a sid chroot using
> debuild or dpkg-buildpackage.  I wouldn't have uploaded it if it
> weren't, and this approach also worked on i386 and s390 (at least).

Isn't the problem that xlibs{,-dev} are now Architecture: all, and their
dependencies can't be satisfied on architectures where the split
libraries haven't been built yet?


-- 
Earthling Michel Dänzer      |     Debian (powerpc), X and DRI developer
Libre software enthusiast    |   http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer



Reply to: