On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 01:49:09AM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > These are things I noticed about the *branch* patches (as opposed to the > trunk patches). > > 009_use_xf86config-4_in_xf86config.diff > ---------------------------------- > This obviously isn't going to go upstream, so shouldn't it be a > 900-series patch? Actually, shouldn't it be part of > 911_debian_XF86Config_to_XF86Config-4.diff I don't know that it OBVIOUSLY isn't going to go upstream, but yes, it would be harmless enough to move it there. > 006_dont_ref_rman.man.diff > -------------------------- > A different variation on this is present upstream in HEAD. Perhaps a > stolen_from_HEAD patch is more appropriate? Yes. We should do what upstream does unless we have a very good reason not to. > 013_xkb_symbols_euro_support.diff > --------------------------------- > Appears to have been fixed differently upstream in HEAD. Perhaps > stolen_from_HEAD patches are more appropriate? Yes, as above. I've added all of the above to the TODO (for post-4.3.0-1). -- G. Branden Robinson | Debian GNU/Linux | If existence exists, branden@debian.org | why create a creator? http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature