[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#226180: not ameanable to configuration with readline frontend; lack of defaults



Branden Robinson wrote:
> I used to have them.  I had to rip them all out when I added the
> autodetection code.  My testing experience showed me that I couldn't
> both do autodetection cleanly and have defaults in the debconf database.

I cannot guess why..

> > Here is another one, using the string type:
> > 
> >   Users of U.S. English keyboards should generally enter "pc104".
> > 
> >   :-) Please select your keyboard model.
> > 
> >   Please enter a value for the entry.
> > 
> >   A null entry is not permitted.
> > 
> >   <proceeds to redislay the whole question>
> 
> As opposed to only part of it?  How would I accomplish that without yet
> another template?  Wouldn't omitting the long description be a frontend
> decision?

I was not objecting to it redisplaying the question, so much as for it
telling me what I should generally enter, and then not making that the
default.

> Ooh, debian-installer/keymap.  That sounds nice.  I've seen you
> complaining about 1 billion different packages that ask what country
> people live in, too.
> 
> You should probably mail debian-devel-announce a heads up to people
> regarding what configuration data is available in debian-installer
> debconf templates.  Once a few people have moved on this (you have my
> support, FWIW), you can say its current practice and ram a Policy
> proposal through.  Perhaps in the release *after* sarge we can get some
> stuff nicely centralized.

I don't understand what policy (or events post-sarge) have to do with
this. If you can make use of the question's answer, I can make it
available with a 1 line change to base-config.

> And I hope that d-i absolutely, unconditionally, always always always
> sets the hostname.  Everybody seems to assume it's set, and nobody
> *EVER* bothers to do any error handling if it isn't.  They're wrong, but
> they're also terminally lazy and we'll never get them all fixed.

I think we may have finally gotten this right, though it's been a bit of
an uphill struggle for me.

-- 
see shy jo

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: