clone 192138 -1 retitle -1 xbase-clients: [xftcache] SEGV on Type1 directory tag -1 upstream moreinfo thanks On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 11:18:14PM +0200, Jack.R wrote: > By trying to understand the diff, I think I did not comment the right fi. > Commenting line 321 is probably more accurate. Yeah, that's what I committed to the repo. > However, I still get a trouble with xftcache [skips the Speedo directory as intended] > Running update-fonts-dir in Type1 font directory...+ '[' update-fonts-dir = xftcache ']' > + update-fonts-dir Type1 > + message done. > + echo done. > + fold -s -w 80 > done. > + which xftcache > ++ basename xftcache > + SHORTCMD=xftcache > + message_nonl 'Running xftcache in Type1 font directory...' > + echo -n 'Running xftcache in Type1 font directory...' > + fold -s -w 80 > Running xftcache in Type1 font directory...+ '[' xftcache = xftcache ']' > + '[' Type1 = Speedo ']' > + DIR=/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Type1 > + xftcache /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Type1 > /var/lib/dpkg/info/xfonts-scalable.postinst: line 452: 2566 Segmentation fault $CMD $DIR Sigh. Well, this is a brand new problem so I am cloning the bug to make a report with the Debian Bug Tracking System. Can you send the new bug the output of the following commands? $ dpkg -S usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Type1 $ dpkg -S libXft I don't know what the new bug number will be yet, but it will probably be assigned by the time you read this. Just go to <URL: http://bugs.debian.org/192138 >, scroll to the bottom, and see what bug 192138 was "cloned as". Then mail that bugnumber @bugs.debian.org. Thank you! -- G. Branden Robinson | "To be is to do" -- Plato Debian GNU/Linux | "To do is to be" -- Aristotle branden@debian.org | "Do be do be do" -- Sinatra http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature