Bug#214426: xlibmesa-gl: experimental packages draw blank GL windows (4.3)
On Mon, 2003-10-06 at 17:11, David Britton wrote:
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=178242
>
> someone who had a similar problem to me (looks to be a rash of bugs on
> this same topic). I am having similar problems with the 4.3.0
> experimental pacakges.
Does that mean that the packages in sid work?
> I apologize if this is not the correct project. I tried to extrapolate from
> other bug reports I found, so hopefully I picked the correct one.
You hit right on the mark; the report is very well written and
informative in general, the lives of Debian maintainers would be easier
if all bug reports were like this. :)
I noticed a couple of things which I wonder if they're related:
> OpenGL renderer string: Mesa DRI G400 20020221 AGP 1x x86/MMX
Does setting the MESA_NO_MMX environment variable make a difference?
> (II) Loading sub module "mga_hal"
> (II) LoadModule: "mga_hal"
> (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/mga_hal_drv.o
> (II) Module mga_hal: vendor="The XFree86 Project"
> compiled for 4.2.0, module version = 1.0.0
> ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.5
> (==) MGA(0): Matrox HAL module used
Does not using the HAL module make a difference?
> (**) MGA(0): Depth 24, (**) framebuffer bpp 32
Does running in depth 16 make a difference?
> (**) MGA(0): VideoRAM: 32768 kByte
Is this correct?
> (--) MGA(0): Virtual size is 1600x1200 (pitch 1600)
> (**) MGA(0): *Default mode "1600x1200": 229.5 MHz, 106.2 kHz, 85.0 Hz
Does running at a lower virtual resolution make a difference?
--
Earthling Michel Dänzer \ Debian (powerpc), XFree86 and DRI developer
Software libre enthusiast \ http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer
Reply to: