On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 10:29:22PM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Admin wrote:
> Author: daniel
> Date: 2003-05-27 22:29:06 -0500 (Tue, 27 May 2003)
> New Revision: 82
>
> Modified:
> branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/rules
> branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/scripts/vars.s390
> Log:
> Move DRM stuff to be in !NOT_BUILDING_XF86_SERVER, not !NOT_BUILDING_X_SERVER,
> and declare that s390 builds no servers whatsoever, not just not building the
> xf86 server, hopefully fixing s390 FTBFS.
That's a regression, then:
xnest | 4.2.1-6 | unstable | alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
xprt | 4.2.1-6 | unstable | alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
xvfb | 4.2.1-6 | unstable | alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
This should be investigated. s390 should be able to build xnest, xvfb,
and xprt. Losing xvfb will kill some Tk and Python-related stuff that
absolutely insists on having a live X server just to build.
--
G. Branden Robinson |
Debian GNU/Linux | If encryption is outlawed, only
branden@debian.org | outlaws will @goH7Ok=<q4fDj]Kz?.
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
Attachment:
pgpUJC_0NTra4.pgp
Description: PGP signature