On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 09:43:40PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > OK. I fixed a bug in gcc 3.4 and hope to backport it to the 3.3 > branch soon; now directives *really* need to be in column 1 to be treated > as directives. This fixes the main problem spotted in the sample at > http://redwald.deadbeast.net/tmp/ABIDING_HATRED_OF_CPP/. > > The other difference is genuinely strange, since the 'expected' result is > produced by cpp-3.2, but not by cpp-2.95 (or 3.3, of course). Accordingly, > I think this probably qualifies as a bug of some sort in the Xresources file; > either that, or the 'actual' output from cpp 3.3 is the correct one and the > 'expected' output from cpp 3.2 is the wrong one. Please help clarify. > > That is this part: > > --- Xresources.expected_output 2003-10-29 13:02:51.000000000 -0500 > +++ Xresources.actual_output 2003-10-28 23:21:02.000000000 -0500 > @@ -7,17 +7,17 @@ > ! > > > -xlogin*login.translations: #override > - Ctrl<Key>R: abort-display()\n > - <Key>F1: set-session-argument(failsafe) finish-field()\n > - <Key>Delete: delete-character()\n > - <Key>Left: move-backward-character()\n > - <Key>Right: move-forward-character()\n > - <Key>Home: move-to-begining()\n > - <Key>End: move-to-end()\n > - Ctrl<Key>KP_Enter: set-session-argument(failsafe) finish-field()\n > - <Key>KP_Enter: set-session-argument() finish-field()\n > - Ctrl<Key>Return: set-session-argument(failsafe) finish-field()\n > +xlogin*login.translations: #override \ > + Ctrl<Key>R: abort-display()\n\ > + <Key>F1: set-session-argument(failsafe) finish-field()\n\ > + <Key>Delete: delete-character()\n\ > + <Key>Left: move-backward-character()\n\ > + <Key>Right: move-forward-character()\n\ > + <Key>Home: move-to-begining()\n\ > + <Key>End: move-to-end()\n\ > + Ctrl<Key>KP_Enter: set-session-argument(failsafe) finish-field()\n\ > + <Key>KP_Enter: set-session-argument() finish-field()\n\ > + Ctrl<Key>Return: set-session-argument(failsafe) finish-field()\n\ > <Key>Return: set-session-argument() finish-field() If I understand you correctly, then the following clarification should help: This "#override" business is not intended to be interpreted by cpp. It is translation table syntax. It means "clobber any existing entries in the event translation table for these events with the ones specified here". I think XFree86 will be happy if "[C preprocessor] directives *really* need to be in column 1 to be treated as directives." -- G. Branden Robinson | You should try building some of the Debian GNU/Linux | stuff in main that is branden@debian.org | modern...turning on -Wall is like http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | turning on the pain. -- James Troup
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature