On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 09:36:31PM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 10:52:47AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> [...]
> > The bug submitter had already contacted the upstream maintainer of
> > XTerm, and the patches had been rejected by him. Apparently, the
> > submitter's goal was to get Debian to fork from upstream after the exact
> > same change had been rejected upstream.
>
> If I follow you, Debian libtool must not be patched too.
dstone@pila:~/debian/xfree86/xsf-repo/branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches% wc -l *
| tail -1 && ls -l | wc -l
106899 total
125
--
Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
http://www.debian.org - http://www.kde.org - http://www.freedesktop.org
"What's next? People turning up on my doorstep, observing that the lack of
doorbell is likely to confuse people and hence removing my front door?"
-- David Woodhouse on usability efforts, Advogato
Attachment:
pgpf6ef1wkcTs.pgp
Description: PGP signature