[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#151959: marked as done (xlibs needs to be recompiled with libfreetype6 >= 2.1.1)



Your message dated Fri, 5 Sep 2003 06:45:00 -0500
with message-id <20030905114500.GB1598@deadbeast.net>
and subject line xlibs needs to be recompiled with libfreetype6 >= 2.1.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Jul 2002 22:02:43 +0000
>From future@galanet.net Thu Jul 04 17:02:43 2002
Return-path: <future@galanet.net>
Received: from pollux.galanet.net [192.118.6.28] (mail)
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 17QEgT-00032N-00; Thu, 04 Jul 2002 17:02:42 -0500
Received: from future by pollux.galanet.net with local (Exim 3.33 #1)
	id 17QEiL-0008MQ-00
	for submit@bugs.debian.org; Fri, 05 Jul 2002 01:04:37 +0300
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2002 01:04:37 +0300
From: Ilya Konstantinov <debian-bug-report@future.shiny.co.il>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: xlibs needs to be recompiled with libfreetype6 >= 2.1.1
Message-ID: <20020704220436.GA32127@pollux.galanet.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Package: xlibs
Version: 4.1.0-17

Recent libfreetype6 (version 2.1.1) breaks backward binary
compatibility and makes libXft crash. Source compatibility is still
retained, so fixing this bug merely requires recompiling xlibs and
bumping libfreetype6 requirement to be >= 2.2.1.

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 151959-done) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Sep 2003 11:45:03 +0000
>From branden@deadbeast.net Fri Sep 05 06:45:01 2003
Return-path: <branden@deadbeast.net>
Received: from dhcp065-026-182-085.indy.rr.com (redwald.deadbeast.net) [65.26.182.85] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 19vF1R-0006rK-00; Fri, 05 Sep 2003 06:45:01 -0500
Received: by redwald.deadbeast.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 488B064207; Fri,  5 Sep 2003 06:45:00 -0500 (EST)
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2003 06:45:00 -0500
From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>
To: 151959-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: xlibs needs to be recompiled with libfreetype6 >= 2.1.1
Message-ID: <20030905114500.GB1598@deadbeast.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="EuxKj2iCbKjpUGkD"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: 151959-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.3 required=4.0
	tests=PGP_SIGNATURE_2,USER_AGENT_MUTT
	version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)


--EuxKj2iCbKjpUGkD
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

This bug was resolved a long time ago.

It is currently fixed in Debian testing, unstable, and experimental.

--=20
G. Branden Robinson                |       Yesterday upon the stair,
Debian GNU/Linux                   |       I met a man who wasn't there.
branden@debian.org                 |       He wasn't there again today,
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |       I think he's from the CIA.

--EuxKj2iCbKjpUGkD
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAj9YdzsACgkQ6kxmHytGonwHWwCbBwQq8vmqAt5w5fmoN/aY4FK+
/aoAoJXagEgPCrPCPkB+d6W+jwu15oRl
=MeOg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--EuxKj2iCbKjpUGkD--



Reply to: