[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#200170: The diff



> [ I think you meant "keyboard randomly doesn't work" -- with the modifier
> placed as you had it, your bug's subject appeared to be complaining that
> the keyboard didn't operate in a random fashion, e.g., every time you
> pressed the "A" key a different keyboard event was generated.
>
> Most people want their keyboards to work deterministically.  :) ]

Hee, hee! It's sometimes hard to find the correct modifier in a foreign 
languaje...

Now, some answers:

I use kdm, but now I've tested that the problem remains if I start the X 
server with startx.

Now hear this: after reporting the bug the problem ocurrs every time I start 
the computer (what amazing and scaring thing!). Maybe that's good, now that's 
always reproducible (in my computer).
It's still solved if I restart the server.

And now the diff report, that seems interesting:

--- XFree86.0.log-working-keyboard	2003-07-06 14:45:56.000000000 +0200
+++ XFree86.0.log-non-working-keyboard	2003-07-06 15:26:04.000000000 +0200
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
 Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting,
          (++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational,
          (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown.
-(==) Log file: "/var/log/XFree86.0.log", Time: Sun Jul  6 14:33:58 2003
+(==) Log file: "/var/log/XFree86.0.log", Time: Sun Jul  6 15:25:25 2003
 (==) Using config file: "/etc/X11/XF86Config-4"
 (==) ServerLayout "Default Layout"
 (**) |-->Screen "Default Screen" (0)
@@ -476,9 +476,3 @@
 (II) UnloadModule: "mouse"
 (II) XINPUT: Adding extended input device "Configured Mouse" (type: MOUSE)
 Could not init font path element unix/:7100, removing from list!
-(II) Open APM successful
-(==) I740(0): Write-combining range (0xe3000000,0x800000)
-(II) I740(0): vgaHWGetIOBase: hwp->IOBase is 0x03d0, hwp->PIOOffset is 0x0000
-(**) I740(0): DPMS enabled
-Could not init font path element unix/:7100, removing from list!
-(II) Open APM successful





Reply to: