On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 11:08:29PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 10:29:22PM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Admin wrote: > > Modified: > > branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/rules > > branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/scripts/vars.s390 > > Log: > > Move DRM stuff to be in !NOT_BUILDING_XF86_SERVER, not !NOT_BUILDING_X_SERVER, > > and declare that s390 builds no servers whatsoever, not just not building the > > xf86 server, hopefully fixing s390 FTBFS. > > That's a regression, then: > > xnest | 4.2.1-6 | unstable | alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc > xprt | 4.2.1-6 | unstable | alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc > xvfb | 4.2.1-6 | unstable | alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc > > This should be investigated. s390 should be able to build xnest, xvfb, > and xprt. Losing xvfb will kill some Tk and Python-related stuff that > absolutely insists on having a live X server just to build. Hmmmmm ... ok, I'll revert vars.s390, but d/r is there to stay. Either way, it should fix the s390 FTBFS. -- Daniel Stone <daniel@raging.dropbear.id.au> <dstone@kde.org> KDE: Konquering a desktop near you - http://www.kde.org
Attachment:
pgp9ejhyEN0ex.pgp
Description: PGP signature