Processed: No really, it's flex's fault

To: Daniel Stone <dstone@kde.org>
Cc: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org>(flex #188665), Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>(xfree86-common #188665)
Subject: Processed: No really, it's flex's fault
From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 01:03:09 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] handler.s.C.105029963732246.transcript@bugs.debian.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20030414055301.GC20105@trinity.unimelb.edu.au>
References: <[🔎] 20030414055301.GC20105@trinity.unimelb.edu.au>

Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:

> reassign 188665 flex
Bug#188665: flex: new upstream release breaks builds
Bug reassigned from package `xfree86-common' to `flex'.

> retitle 188665 flex: yy_more_prev_offset is a figment of flex's imagination
Bug#188665: flex: new upstream release breaks builds
Changed Bug title.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Reply to:

References:
- Bug#188665: No really, it's flex's fault
  - From: Daniel Stone <dstone@kde.org>

Prev by Date: Re: X bi-monthly snapshot packages.
Next by Date: Bug#188665: No really, it's flex's fault
Previous by thread: Bug#188665: No really, it's flex's fault
Next by thread: Bug#188665: No really, it's flex's fault
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread