Bug#188665: RC issue
>> On Sun, 13 Apr 2003 17:40:26 -0400 (EDT),
>> Jack Howarth <howarth@bromo.med.uc.edu> said:
> Wouldn't it be better to have a temporary back-compatibility
> package for the old flex as a stop-gap measure so things could
> progress on other fronts while the lex stuff was sorted out?
One can always build depend on older versions of flex. But I
say that in unstable, when we are not nearing a freeze, is the best
time to move ahead with the c99/gcc-3.2 migration, and fix our
packages before releasing Sarge.
manoj
--
A closed mouth gathers no foot.
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
Reply to: