tag 186321 + moreinfo thanks On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 04:51:01AM +0000, Colin Watson wrote: > The changelog for 4.1.0-7 claims that patch #032 adds a > ComplexCplusplusProgramTargetNoMan() Imake rule. However, what it > actually does, apparently by mistake, is add a second version of > ComplexCplusplusProgramTarget(). Since one of those already exists > further up Imake.rules, the patch has no useful effect. > > I need this in order to make nitpic build with g++ >= 3.0 (previously it > built with the non-"Cplusplus" variant of the Imake rule, but that > produces incorrect linkage with the more modern g++); see #127162. I > guess I might just write a man page in order to get it going, though. :) Gack, you're right. The fix was easy, and this problem will be resolved in the next release. Now I'm trying to figure out how this went so long without being detected. I know that it *cannot* be the case that people have suddenly started writing manpages...I mean, that would just make too much *sense*. -- G. Branden Robinson | Any man who does not realize that Debian GNU/Linux | he is half an animal is only half a branden@debian.org | man. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Thornton Wilder
Attachment:
pgpbw1xxR65gC.pgp
Description: PGP signature