[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#165899: marked as done (xlibs-dbg: please ship unstripped versions of the Xlib i18n support modules)

Your message dated Mon, 25 Nov 2002 00:31:04 +0900
with message-id <20021125003104.768e1827.minami@chem.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp>
and subject line Bug#165899: xlibs-dbg: no unstripped libs for /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/locale/common/*
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Oct 2002 14:08:40 +0000
>From minami@lissie.chem.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Tue Oct 22 09:08:39 2002
Return-path: <minami@lissie.chem.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp>
Received: from lissie.chem.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp [] (5fa57cb6ea18aa3d1759f6a01a299de8)
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 183zi3-0000wL-00; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 09:08:39 -0500
Received: by lissie.chem.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 3B20DBB7F; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 23:08:38 +0900 (JST)
From: MINAMI Hirokazu <minami@chem.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: xlibs-dbg: no unstripped libs for /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/locale/common/* 
X-Debbugs-CC: MINAMI Hirokazu <minami@chem.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp>
Message-Id: <20021022140838.3B20DBB7F@lissie.chem.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 23:08:38 +0900 (JST)
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0

Package: xlibs-dbg
Version: 4.2.1-3
Severity: wishlist

-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Kernel Version: Linux lissie 2.4.19 #1 Thu Aug 22 21:43:27 JST 2002 i686 AMD Athlon(tm) Processor AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux

Versions of the packages xlibs-dbg depends on:
hi  libfreetype6   2.1.2-5        FreeType 2 font engine, shared library files
ii  libc6          2.3.1-3        GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone
ii  xlibs          4.2.1-3        X Window System client libraries

Some i18n related libraries included are located under /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/locale/common/.
However, corresponding unstripped libraries do not present in the "xlibs-dbg" package.

I'm suspecting that there's some memory leaks in /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/locale/common/xomGeneric.so.2 
and need a debugging version of the library.

Would you include such a libraries in the -dbg package?


Received: (at 165899-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Nov 2002 15:31:08 +0000
>From minami@chem.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Sun Nov 24 09:31:06 2002
Return-path: <minami@chem.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp>
Received: from lissie.chem.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp [] (ac0836de9c57c9b18b76322ff3d50455)
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 18Fyiw-0008Os-00; Sun, 24 Nov 2002 09:31:06 -0600
Received: from lissie.chem.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp (lissie.chem.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp [])
	by lissie.chem.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp (Postfix) with SMTP id 84C73BB46
	for <165899-done@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 25 Nov 2002 00:31:04 +0900 (JST)
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 00:31:04 +0900
From: MINAMI Hirokazu <minami@chem.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp>
To: 165899-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#165899: xlibs-dbg: no unstripped libs for /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/locale/common/*
Message-Id: <20021125003104.768e1827.minami@chem.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp>
In-Reply-To: <20021022163114.GU30774@deadbeast.net>
References: <20021022140838.3B20DBB7F@lissie.chem.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.5 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-debian-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: 165899-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.7 required=5.0

I've confirmed that unstripped libraries included 
in the latest package(4.2.1-4) are usable for debugging.


minami <minami@chem.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp>

Reply to: