[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#166497: marked as done (x-window-system: should depend on x-display-manager instead of xdm)



Your message dated Mon, 28 Oct 2002 12:38:21 -0500
with message-id <20021028173821.GJ17459@deadbeast.net>
and subject line [166497@bugs.debian.org: Bug#166497: x-window-system: should depend on x-display-manager instead of xdm]
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Oct 2002 18:32:17 +0000
>From agthorr@barsoom.org Sat Oct 26 13:32:16 2002
Return-path: <agthorr@barsoom.org>
Received: from d172-169.uoregon.edu (amorphia) [128.223.172.169] (mail)
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 185VjL-0006Nc-00; Sat, 26 Oct 2002 13:32:15 -0500
Received: from d172-163.uoregon.edu
	([128.223.172.163] helo=volition ident=mail)
	by amorphia with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 185VjI-00071R-00; Sat, 26 Oct 2002 11:32:12 -0700
Received: from agthorr by volition with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 185VjH-0000Wg-00; Sat, 26 Oct 2002 11:32:11 -0700
From: Agthorr <agthorr@barsoom.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: x-window-system: should depend on x-display-manager instead of xdm
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 11:32:11 -0700
Message-Id: <[🔎] E185VjH-0000Wg-00@volition>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0
	tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
	version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: x-window-system
Version: 4.1.0-16
Severity: normal

The x-window-system should depend on x-display-manager (provided by
xdm, gdm, kdm, and wdm) instead of on xdm.

-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux volition 2.4.19volition #1 Fri Oct 25 14:29:28 PDT 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages x-window-system depends on:
ii  lbxproxy                      4.1.0-16   Low Bandwidth X (LBX) proxy server
ii  proxymngr                     4.1.0-16   X proxy services manager
ii  twm                           4.1.0-16   Tab window manager
ii  x-window-system-core          4.1.0-16   X Window System core components
ii  xdm                           4.1.0-16   X display manager
ii  xfs                           4.1.0-16   X font server
ii  xfwp                          4.1.0-16   X firewall proxy server
ii  xnest                         4.1.0-16   nested X server
ii  xprt                          4.1.0-16   X print server
ii  xspecs                        4.1.0-16   X protocol, extension, and library
ii  xterm                         4.1.0-16   X terminal emulator
ii  xvfb                          4.1.0-16   virtual framebuffer X server


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 166497-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Oct 2002 17:38:22 +0000
>From branden@deadbeast.net Mon Oct 28 11:38:22 2002
Return-path: <branden@deadbeast.net>
Received: from pcp942041pcs.cstltn01.in.comcast.net (apocalypse.deadbeast.net) [68.57.244.226] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 186DqH-000734-00; Mon, 28 Oct 2002 11:38:21 -0600
Received: by apocalypse.deadbeast.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 54E4F42FF; Mon, 28 Oct 2002 12:38:21 -0500 (EST)
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 12:38:21 -0500
From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>
To: 166497-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: [166497@bugs.debian.org: Bug#166497: x-window-system: should depend on x-display-manager instead of xdm]
Message-ID: <20021028173821.GJ17459@deadbeast.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="NhBACjNc9vV+/oop"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
X-No-CC: I subscribe to this list; do not CC me on replies.
Delivered-To: 166497-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.9 required=5.0
	tests=PGP_SIGNATURE_2,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,
	      USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT
	version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 


--NhBACjNc9vV+/oop
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Forgot to actually close this bug.

----- Forwarded message from 166497@bugs.debian.org -----

From: 166497@bugs.debian.org
To: 166497-submitter@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#166497: x-window-system: should depend on x-display-manager
    instead of xdm
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 19:41:18 -0500
Message-Id: <[🔎] 20021028004118.GB11697@deadbeast.net>
X-Mailing-List: <debian-x@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/5328
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
X-No-CC: I subscribe to this list; do not CC me on replies.
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3D-6.5 required=3D4.0 tests=3DSENT_BY_BTS,IN_REP_TO=
,FROM_STARTS_WITH_NUMS,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,NO_REAL_NAME version=3D2.20

On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 09:57:10PM -0700, Marc Wilson wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 11:32:11AM -0700, Agthorr wrote:
> > Package: x-window-system
> > Version: 4.1.0-16
> > Severity: normal
> >=20
> > The x-window-system should depend on x-display-manager (provided by
> > xdm, gdm, kdm, and wdm) instead of on xdm.
>=20
> How is this anything more than a wishlist bug?  What's going to win if
> NOTHING is installed, which is when people are going to be installing
> x-window-system in the first place.
>=20
> Xdm is the XFree-provided display manager.  Install another if you want
> another.  All the display managers can co-exist.

Marc's analysis is exactly correct.  "x-window-system" core exists to
give the user practically everything from the XFree86 distribution.

That means not just any window manager, but twm.

That means not just any terminal emulator, but xterm.

That means not just any display manager, but xdm.

It sounds like "x-window-system-core" is more suited to your purposes,
if you don't care for xdm.

Package: x-window-system-core
Architecture: any
Depends: ${F:XWSC-Special-Depends}xlibmesa3, xfonts-base (>> 4.0), xfonts-1=
00dpi, xfonts-75dpi, xfonts-scalable, xbase-clients, xutils
Description: X Window System core components
 This metapackage provides the essential components for a standalone
 workstation running the X Window System.  It provides the X libraries, an X
 server (except on the S/390 architecture), a set of fonts, and a group of
 basic X clients and utilities.
 .
 Higher level metapackages, such as those for desktop environments, can
 depend on this package and simplify their dependencies.
 .
 It should be noted that a package providing x-window-manager and a package
 providing x-terminal-emulator should also be installed to ensure a
 comfortable X experience.

Package: x-window-system
Architecture: all
Depends: x-window-system-core, lbxproxy, proxymngr, twm, xdm, xfs, xfwp, xn=
est, xprt, xspecs, xterm, xvfb
Description: X Window System
 This metapackage provides substantially all the components of the X Window
 System as developed by the XFree86 Project, as well as a set of historical=
ly
 popular accessory programs.
 .
 The development and debugging libraries are not provided by this metapacka=
ge.

Closing this bug, which appears to be a product of failure to read the
package description.

--=20
G. Branden Robinson                |       The only way to get rid of a
Debian GNU/Linux                   |       temptation is to yield to it.
branden@debian.org                 |       -- Oscar Wilde
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |



----- End forwarded message -----

--=20
G. Branden Robinson                |     Human beings rarely imagine a god
Debian GNU/Linux                   |     that behaves any better than a
branden@debian.org                 |     spoiled child.
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |     -- Robert Heinlein

--NhBACjNc9vV+/oop
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAj29dg0ACgkQ6kxmHytGonx9CwCfZcr1C4ayCCa92g33T4YlqkML
Q3gAn2xJMZONYeB50PxkNqOCQahQW0w2
=uk1c
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--NhBACjNc9vV+/oop--



Reply to: