[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#166562: marked as done (xfree86: please modify debian/README to allow IPv6 specific patches )



Your message dated Sun, 27 Oct 2002 19:57:15 -0500
with message-id <20021028005715.GE11697@deadbeast.net>
and subject line Bug#166562: xfree86: please modify debian/README to allow IPv6 specific patches
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Oct 2002 07:32:16 +0000
>From ik5pvx@home.tippete.net Sun Oct 27 01:32:15 2002
Return-path: <ik5pvx@home.tippete.net>
Received: from (penny.tippete.net) [62.211.255.247] (mail)
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 185huB-00009i-00; Sun, 27 Oct 2002 01:32:15 -0600
Received: from ik5pvx by penny.tippete.net with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 185hu8-0003KX-00
	for <maintonly@bugs.debian.org>; Sun, 27 Oct 2002 08:32:12 +0100
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <maintonly@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: xfree86: please modify debian/README to allow IPv6 specific patches 
X-Debbugs-CC: fabbione@fabbione.net
Reply-To: Pierfrancesco Caci <pf@tippete.net>
From: Pierfrancesco Caci <ik5pvx@penny.ik5pvx.ampr.org>
Date: 27 Oct 2002 08:32:12 +0100
Message-ID: <[🔎] 87hef8z69v.fsf@penny.ik5pvx.ampr.org>
Lines: 37
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: Pierfrancesco Caci <ik5pvx@home.tippete.net>
Delivered-To: maintonly@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0
	tests=SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
	version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: xfree86
Version: 4.2.1-3; reported 2002-10-27
Severity: wishlist
Tags: sid

Hello, can you please modify the debian/README file so as to read:

    900-999 patches that should not be sent upstream
         900-988         Debian-specific behavior and enhancements
         989             experimental or debugging patches (should not
                         generally be present in a production release)
         990-999         Debian-IPv6-specific patches


This way the IPv6 effort can have 10 patch slots that are guaranteed not to
clash with other teams' patches.

Thank you

Pf



-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux penny 2.4.20-pre10 #1 Sun Oct 13 10:33:45 CEST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C


-- 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Pierfrancesco Caci | ik5pvx | mailto:p.caci@tin.it  -  http://gusp.dyndns.org
  Firenze - Italia  | Office for the Complication of Otherwise Simple Affairs 
     Linux penny 2.4.20-pre10 #1 Sun Oct 13 10:33:45 CEST 2002 i686 Pentium II (Deschutes) GenuineIntel GNU/Linux


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 166562-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Oct 2002 00:57:18 +0000
>From branden@deadbeast.net Sun Oct 27 18:57:16 2002
Return-path: <branden@deadbeast.net>
Received: from pcp942041pcs.cstltn01.in.comcast.net (apocalypse.deadbeast.net) [68.57.244.226] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 185yDU-00062b-00; Sun, 27 Oct 2002 18:57:16 -0600
Received: by apocalypse.deadbeast.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id E549543C1; Sun, 27 Oct 2002 19:57:15 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 19:57:15 -0500
From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>
To: 166562-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#166562: xfree86: please modify debian/README to allow IPv6 specific patches
Message-ID: <20021028005715.GE11697@deadbeast.net>
References: <[🔎] 87hef8z69v.fsf@penny.ik5pvx.ampr.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="OzigliFs3e0dNr73"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 87hef8z69v.fsf@penny.ik5pvx.ampr.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
X-No-CC: I subscribe to this list; do not CC me on replies.
Delivered-To: 166562-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-16.5 required=5.0
	tests=IN_REP_TO,PGP_SIGNATURE_2,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,
	      SPAM_PHRASE_02_03,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT
	version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 


--OzigliFs3e0dNr73
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 08:32:12AM +0100, Pierfrancesco Caci wrote:
> Package: xfree86
> Version: 4.2.1-3; reported 2002-10-27
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: sid
>=20
> Hello, can you please modify the debian/README file so as to read:
>=20
>     900-999 patches that should not be sent upstream
>          900-988         Debian-specific behavior and enhancements
>          989             experimental or debugging patches (should not
>                          generally be present in a production release)
>          990-999         Debian-IPv6-specific patches
>=20
>=20
> This way the IPv6 effort can have 10 patch slots that are guaranteed not =
to
> clash with other teams' patches.

It's unnecessary to report this as a bug.

Use whatever patch numbers you need to; it'll be my (well, the X Strike
Force's) task when you send them along to integrate them.

I'm not very worried about the IPv6 patches because:

1) presumably you'll want to be sending them upstream as well,
eventually
2) they probably won't touch code that is being patched elsewhere in the
tree

Closing this unnecessary bug report.

--=20
G. Branden Robinson                |
Debian GNU/Linux                   |         Ab abusu ad usum non valet
branden@debian.org                 |         consequentia.
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |

--OzigliFs3e0dNr73
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAj28i2sACgkQ6kxmHytGonyqJQCgiHlx8FAbmOCzSWVnyrt0SI3T
EbkAnAvdJgAUdPfJsMx5Zr2vXGH4u++n
=VcKv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--OzigliFs3e0dNr73--



Reply to: