Bug#163885: marked as done (xserver-xfree86: [dri] r128.o kernel module version is 2.1.6 but version 2.2 or greater is needed.)
Your message dated Sat, 12 Oct 2002 11:02:36 -0500
with message-id <20021012160236.GH10464@deadbeast.net>
and subject line you need a newer kernel
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Oct 2002 00:54:09 +0000
>From lazarus@overdue.ddts.net Tue Oct 08 19:54:08 2002
Return-path: <lazarus@overdue.ddts.net>
Received: from 208-186-55-240.nrp3feld.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (phoenix.overdue.ddts.net) [208.186.55.240] (postfix)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17z572-00062G-00; Tue, 08 Oct 2002 19:54:08 -0500
Received: by phoenix.overdue.ddts.net (Postfix, from userid 1002)
id 5015973077; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 00:54:01 +0000 (UTC)
From: Lazarus Long <lazarus@overdue.ddts.net>
Subject: xserver-xfree86: [dri] r128.o kernel module version is 2.1.6 but version 2.2 or greater is needed.
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10.1
Message-Id: <[🔎] 20021009005401.5015973077@phoenix.overdue.ddts.net>
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2002 00:54:01 +0000 (UTC)
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: N/A
Severity: important
(Probably higher severity, due to hardware threat, but ... ?)
(Invoked as user, with a plain "startx" command line)
(protocol Version 11, revision 0, vendor release 6600)
Release Date: 3 September 2002
If the server is older than 6-12 months, or if your card is
newer than the above date, look for a newer version before
reporting problems. (See http://www.XFree86.Org/)
Build Operating System: Linux 2.4.18 i686 [ELF]
Module Loader present
Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting,
(++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational,
(WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown.
(==) Log file: "/var/log/XFree86.0.log", Time: Wed Oct 9 00:39:15 2002
(==) Using config file: "/etc/X11/XF86Config-4"
(EE) R128(0): [dri] R128DRIScreenInit failed because of a version mismatch.
[dri] r128.o kernel module version is 2.1.6 but version 2.2 or greater is needed.
[dri] Disabling the DRI.
(EE) R128(0): [drm] failed to remove DRM signal handler
DRIUnlock called when not locked
(EE) xf86OpenSerial: Cannot open device /dev/input/mice
No such file or directory.
(EE) Generic Mouse: cannot open input device
(EE) PreInit failed for input device "Generic Mouse"
_IceTransmkdir: Owner of /tmp/.ICE-unix should be set to root
SESSION_MANAGER=local/farm:/tmp/.ICE-unix/5500
SetKbdSettings - type: 2 rate: 30 delay: 500 snumlk: 0
SetKbdSettings - Succeeded
Warning: This version of gmix was compiled with
OSS version 3.8.2, and your system is running
version 3.8.16.
X connection to :0.0 broken (explicit kill or server shutdown).
Gdk-ERROR **: X connection to :0.0 broken (explicit kill or server shutdown).
xinit: connection to X server lost.
X connection to :0.0 broken (explicit kill or server shutdown).
xscreensaver-gl-helper: couldn't open display :0.0
X connection to :0.0 broken (explicit kill or server shutdown).
(I Alt-Ctrl-Backspace'd here, due to the screen mess and fear of hardware
damage.)
The kernel is 2.4.19, so I'm not sure how to get any more recent version
of this kernel module. Did you compile this against a 2.5.X box perhaps?
Hmmm, no, I see "Build Operating System: Linux 2.4.18 i686 [ELF]"
so that's not it. Where did you manage to get something more recent
than what's in the current stable kernel, while running a current-1
kernel version? Odd, at best.
I had hoped 4.2.1-2 would fix this, so held off on filing until trying
that, but it still has the same problem. This problem was not present
in 4.1.0-whatever (sarge) versions and only showed up in 4.2.1-1, to
my awareness.
What further info would you like? What would you like me to test?
-- System Information
Debian Release: post-3.0(+)
Kernel Version: Linux phoenix 2.4.19 #1 Tue Sep 17 20:34:42 UTC 2002 i586 unknown unknown GNU/Linux
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 163885-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Oct 2002 16:02:37 +0000
>From branden@deadbeast.net Sat Oct 12 11:02:36 2002
Return-path: <branden@deadbeast.net>
Received: from pcp942041pcs.cstltn01.in.comcast.net (apocalypse.deadbeast.net) [68.57.244.226]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 180Oiq-0006zf-00; Sat, 12 Oct 2002 11:02:36 -0500
Received: by apocalypse.deadbeast.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 604B940EB; Sat, 12 Oct 2002 11:02:36 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2002 11:02:36 -0500
From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>
To: 163885-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: you need a newer kernel
Message-ID: <20021012160236.GH10464@deadbeast.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="aF3LVLvitz/VQU3c"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
Delivered-To: 163885-done@bugs.debian.org
--aF3LVLvitz/VQU3c
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
As Michel D=E4nzer pointed out, you need a newer kernel.
The XFree86 packages cannot upgrade your kernel for you.
Closing this bug.
--=20
G. Branden Robinson | Don't use nuclear weapons to
Debian GNU/Linux | troubleshoot faults.
branden@debian.org | -- US Air Force Instruction 91-111
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
--aF3LVLvitz/VQU3c
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAj2oR5wACgkQ6kxmHytGonzSaQCbBHumrCJvT4X5oav4VLrzxgfd
5dUAoIv2YILOkBsC0jaxrTR5pNmnDQCk
=O8lY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--aF3LVLvitz/VQU3c--
Reply to: