xfree86 4.1.0-15 broken display
[mostly x-posted from debian-user]
I sidegraded to 4.1.0-15 of xfree86 this morning via apt-get, and now my
display is hosed up (again). I have an ATI Radeon All-in-Wonder with a
Samsung SymcMaster 210T LCD display connected via the DVI connector.
Before my upgrade, this was working perfectly. I didn't need any
modelines or anything like that to run the display at 1600x1200, 24-bit
color. 1600x1200 is the native resolution.
Now, when I start the xserver my monitor turns itself off. I cannot get
it to work in 1600x1200 at all. The server is in fact running in that
mode, and I can see the timings in /var/log/XFree86.0.log, which look
fine. But the signal is actually bogus according to the monitor.
I even allowed dexconf to reconfigure the server and that did not
produce a working configuration.
Here are some parts of the current non-working configuration:
Section "Device"
Identifier "ATI Radeon All-in-Wonder"
Driver "radeon"
EndSection
Section "Monitor"
Identifier "Samsung SyncMaster 210T"
HorizSync 30-81
VertRefresh 60
DisplaySize 432 324
# Option "DPMS"
EndSection
Section "Screen"
Identifier "Default Screen"
Device "ATI Radeon All-in-Wonder"
Monitor "Samsung SyncMaster 210T"
DefaultDepth 24
SubSection "Display"
Depth 24
Modes "1600x1200"
EndSubSection
EndSection
And here are some snips from the log file:
(--) Chipset ATI Radeon QD (AGP) found
(II) RADEON(0): Supported additional Video Mode:
(II) RADEON(0): clock: 129.4 MHz Image Size: 518 x 324 mm <= This is bogus, see display size above!
(II) RADEON(0): h_active: 1600 h_sync: 1630 h_sync_end 1680 h_blank_end 1760 h_border: 0
(II) RADEON(0): v_active: 1200 v_sync: 1201 v_sync_end 1204 v_blanking: 1225 v_border: 0
(II) RADEON(0): Ranges: V min: 56 V max: 85 Hz, H min: 30 H max: 81 kHz, PixClock max 150 MHz
Anybody have any clues? Right now I'm running the monitor at 1280x960
and that is a waste.
-jwb
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: