Hello folks, I have made some proposed revisions to Debian X policy. None of them should come as a surprise to readers of this mailing list. Please check out the debian-policy mailing list. I'd appreciate discussion of these proposals (remember to mail the bugs under which they were filed, not the debian-policy mailing list). You can also find these proposals at the following URL's: http://bugs.debian.org/91249 http://bugs.debian.org/91252 http://bugs.debian.org/91257 http://bugs.debian.org/91259 http://bugs.debian.org/91260 http://bugs.debian.org/91261 I still need seconds for 91252, 91257, and 91261. Here are the one-line summaries: 91249 [PROPOSED] bring X support policy into line with must/should/may usage 91252 [PROPOSED] enhanced x-terminal-emulator policy, second try 91257 [PROPOSED] changes to X font policy 91259 [PROPOSED] minor changes to app-defaults policy 91260 [PROPOSED] reclarifying the policy about X and the FHS 91261 [PROPOSED] modernized rewording of X/Motif policy -- G. Branden Robinson | Debian GNU/Linux | If existence exists, branden@debian.org | why create a creator? http://www.debian.org/~branden/ |
Attachment:
pgpfuV7aHDQXw.pgp
Description: PGP signature