Re: HELP WANTED: doogiebug strikes latest XFree86 packages
- To: Mark Montague <monty@gg.caltech.edu>
- Cc: debian-x@lists.debian.org, 90622@bugs.debian.org, 90658@bugs.debian.org, 90661@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: HELP WANTED: doogiebug strikes latest XFree86 packages
- From: "Marcelo E. Magallon" <mmagallo@debian.org>
- Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 23:57:48 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20010322235748.A22700@ysabell.wh.vaih>
- Mail-followup-to: Mark Montague <monty@gg.caltech.edu>, debian-x@lists.debian.org, 90622@bugs.debian.org, 90658@bugs.debian.org, 90661@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 200103222225.OAA26064@muggy.gg.caltech.edu>; from monty@gg.caltech.edu on Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 02:25:11PM -0800
- References: <[🔎] 20010322031757.C960@deadbeast.net> <[🔎] 200103220848.AAA21068@muggy.gg.caltech.edu> <[🔎] 20010322123458.A435@ysabell.wh.vaih> <[🔎] 200103222225.OAA26064@muggy.gg.caltech.edu>
>> Mark Montague <monty@gg.caltech.edu> writes:
> % strings /usr/lib/libc5-compat/libXmu.so.6 | grep libc.so
using readelf (or objdump) is more accurate, e.g.:
$ readelf -d /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6.2 | grep NEEDED
0x00000001 (NEEDED) Shared library: [libc.so.6]
> So it looks like the libc5-compat libs may have been linked to the
> wrong libc this time around, maybe.
Yeah, it looks broken.
--
Marcelo
Reply to: