[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: r128 driver, unresolved symbols, XF86 4.0.2-1



On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 01:23:32AM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> jingai wrote:
> > And I was specifying "r128" in the Device section before this release,
> > which worked up until now.  "ati" works fine though, so it's not a huge
> > deal, but it's obviously a buglet, probably introduced when merging
> > the two drivers.
> 
> I'm not sure. The merge happened before 4.0.1e so it was even in earlier debs.
> 
> BTW I forgot that you're also running on PPC; this is very interesting because
> "r128" works for me. Now I'm very confused.

I presume that if you explicitly mention enough things in the Modules
section of the XF86Config-4 file, the module dependencies will be satisfied
accidentally.

-- 
G. Branden Robinson             |
Debian GNU/Linux                |    Please do not look directly into laser
branden@debian.org              |    with remaining eye.
http://www.debian.org/~branden/ |

Attachment: pgpOJKffmkPnw.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: