Re: [Dri-devel] Re: Debian DRI CVS packages ready for testing.
On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 02:51:14PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> Alan Hourihane wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 02:33:19PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > > Jules Bean wrote:
> > >
> > > > jules@pear [17] LIBGL_DEBUG=1 glxinfo
> > > > libGL error: dlopen failed: /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/tdfx_dri.so:
> > > > cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
> > > > libGL error: dlopen failed: /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/tdfx_dri.so:
> > > > cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
> > > > display: :0.0 screen:0
> > > > direct rendering: No
> > > >
> > > > A working workaround for me is to ln -s /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri to
> > > > ../modules-dri/dri. It looks like the ModulePath things aren't doing
> > > > their job:
> > >
> > > [snip]
> > >
> > > Indeed, the ModulePaths only affect the X server, the clients
> > > (libGL.so.1.2 to be precise) look for *_dri.so in
> > > $(ProjectRoot)/lib/modules/dri/ . I guess they should be moved there.
> > >
> > Indeed, but from the code, you should be able to set
> >
> > LIBGL_DRIVERS_PATH
> >
> > to point to your *_dri.so files.
>
> Yeah, another workaround. :)
>
> I just realized that the modules are probably moved from the correct location
> to the wrong one in debian/rules so that just has to be modified such that
> only the driver modules get moved to .../modules-dri/drivers/ . If I wasn't at
> work right now I'd include a patch.
Or, if there's a reason not to want to pollute the modules directory
which belongs to Branden's packages, libGL could presumably be patched
to look in the new location?
Jules
Reply to: