[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: libXmu: found automatically on i386, not on vore



On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 12:31:30PM -0500, Chris Gray wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Mar 2001, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > I've got Bug #90459, which says libXmu was not identified when
> > compiling on vore (that's sparc, isn't it? not that it's real
> > important).
> > 
> 
> (cgray4 ~)-> ldd /usr/lib/libGL.so
>         libggi.so.2 => /usr/lib/libggi.so.2 (0x4025d000)
>         libSM.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libSM.so.6 (0x40268000)
>         libICE.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libICE.so.6 (0x40272000)
>         libXmu.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXmu.so.6 (0x40288000)
>         libXext.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXext.so.6 (0x4029d000)
>         libXi.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXi.so.6 (0x402ab000)
>         libX11.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x402b3000)
>         libpthread.so.0 => /lib/libpthread.so.0 (0x4038d000)
>         libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x403a3000)
>         libgii.so.0 => /usr/lib/libgii.so.0 (0x404b2000)
>         libgg.so.0 => /usr/lib/libgg.so.0 (0x404ba000)
>         libXt.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXt.so.6 (0x404c0000)
>         /lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x2aaaa000)
>         libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x4050a000)
> 
> This is on i386.  I would guess that libXmu doesn't show up on vore.
> In any case, it's better to link explicitly with all the libraries
> that you need.
> 

Yes, that looks like it.  vore sez:

(base)dparsons@vore:~$ ldd /usr/lib/libGL.so
        libpthread.so.0 => /lib/libpthread.so.0 (0x70070000)
        libXext.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXext.so.6 (0x70094000)
        libX11.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x700b6000)
        libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x701b2000)
        libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x701c6000)
        /lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x08000000)

Thanks for the clue.

Drew

-- 
PGP public key available at http://dparsons.webjump.com/drewskey.txt
Fingerprint: A110 EAE1 D7D2 8076 5FE0  EC0A B6CE 7041 6412 4E4A



Reply to: